GBC was arrested Wednesday afternoon??...unless I've lost a day somewhere...lol.
My bad. My point was that the Townsville visit was definitely the day before.
GBC was arrested Wednesday afternoon??...unless I've lost a day somewhere...lol.
As I've said once before here, I know for a FACT that the arresting officer and other QPS officers went to Townsville to meet with Olivia the DAY BEFORE GBC was arrested. Not Monday, not Tuesday, not three weeks earlier ... it was WEDNESDAY. Gerard was arrested on the Thursday. I find it very difficult to not link these two events. What did Olivia say or not say that led officers to go ahead with the arrest the very next day? I find Olivia's current position very difficult to read in this context ... is she perhaps feeling guilty about her part in Gerard's arrest? Does she want him to see (or at least hear of through his lawyer) her tangible support? Even if she believes him to be guilty, she may well feel that he doesn't deserve to spend his life in jail and that he would not do anything dastardly again? She must be very, very conflicted right now. MOO.
GBC was arrested Wednesday afternoon??...unless I've lost a day somewhere...lol.
As I've said once before here, I know for a FACT that the arresting officer and other QPS officers went to Townsville to meet with Olivia the DAY BEFORE GBC was arrested. Not Monday, not Tuesday, not three weeks earlier ... it was WEDNESDAY. Gerard was arrested on the Thursday. I find it very difficult to not link these two events. What did Olivia say or not say that led officers to go ahead with the arrest the very next day? I find Olivia's current position very difficult to read in this context ... is she perhaps feeling guilty about her part in Gerard's arrest? Does she want him to see (or at least hear of through his lawyer) her tangible support? Even if she believes him to be guilty, she may well feel that he doesn't deserve to spend his life in jail and that he would not do anything dastardly again? She must be very, very conflicted right now. MOO.
Will he or won't he appear today? ... I think he will stay in the comfy medical unit. What do you all think?
Another Lunch Break video coming up right about now....
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/family-appeals-for-help-on-fees/story-e6freon6-1226403540069
Then Legal Aid will step in. Then we will all be paying for his legal fees. I said when he was arrested that I wondered how long the legal specialists would hang around.Baden-Clay bail application
21 June 2012 , 8:21 AM by Spencer Howson
The Supreme Court will today hear a bail application for 41-year-old Gerard Baden-Clay who was last week charged with murdering his wife and unlawfully interfering with a corpse.
According to Ten News and The Courier-Mail, Gerard Baden-Clay's family has made an appeal to family and friends to raise money to defend his innocence.
Terry O'Gorman is vice president of the Queensland Council of Civil Liberties. He's a defence lawyer - though not Gerard Baden-Clay's. I spoke to him about the fundraising efforts moments ago:
Thank you Makara
IMO begging for money indicates that GBC and his current financial supporters (if there are any) have already run out of money for legal costs. It's very very early days for the case. If they are having trouble now, what will the do when the costs start piling up?
The $30,000 his legal team appear to be demanding before they turn up to court today is a tiny part of what will be an enormous bill. Where's the rest of the money going to come from?? - more begging emails?? Someone will have to pay for it if GBC and all the other BCs can't or won't pay the bills.
I mentioned last Friday my daughter works in a lab and that I asked her about beard hair.
Im old member just one that posts very little lol
Thanks Radster. you say its fact and i believe it. seems on here anything we say we know is just hearsay unless we can line up names addresses times places etc. some stuff we know we cannot say more about. for example it could have been a relative of yours who went but u cant put that here. seems everthing must be verified yet people believe any garbage as long as it is the paper:banghead:No Marlywings, it was Wednesday.. Radster thanks for the info, interesting. Please don't take offence if I file it under the useful hearsay file.. I believe you must have a reason for stating it as fact just as some other posters have had information over time, but as we can't verify it we do not know what you know as factual.. But still interesting to keep in mind.
Case closed and Bayside,
Can you remember a new member talking about forensic information a few weeks ago and her daughter worked in a lab? It was around the time the subject was on decomposition/water etc re Allison.
Thanks Radster. you say its fact and i believe it. seems on here anything we say we know is just hearsay unless we can line up names addresses times places etc. some stuff we know we cannot say more about. for example it could have been a relative of yours who went but u cant put that here. seems everthing must be verified yet people believe any garbage as long as it is the paper:banghead:
I noticed Alison Sandy sidestepped the question about where she got the email.
The Law List still has it for 2:30 pm, however I note that Justice Martin has several other things for 2:00 pm, hence a delay may be possible.
http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__external/CourtsLawList/Brisbane.htm
Will he or won't he appear today? ... I think he will stay in the comfy medical unit. What do you all think?
I noticed Alison Sandy sidestepped the question about where she got the email.
I recall reading that he would not appear, cant remember where.