ARREST!!! Australia - Allison Baden-Clay, Brisbane QLD, 19 April 2012 -#25

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
As I've said once before here, I know for a FACT that the arresting officer and other QPS officers went to Townsville to meet with Olivia the DAY BEFORE GBC was arrested. Not Monday, not Tuesday, not three weeks earlier ... it was WEDNESDAY. Gerard was arrested on the Thursday. I find it very difficult to not link these two events. What did Olivia say or not say that led officers to go ahead with the arrest the very next day? I find Olivia's current position very difficult to read in this context ... is she perhaps feeling guilty about her part in Gerard's arrest? Does she want him to see (or at least hear of through his lawyer) her tangible support? Even if she believes him to be guilty, she may well feel that he doesn't deserve to spend his life in jail and that he would not do anything dastardly again? She must be very, very conflicted right now. MOO.

GBC was arrested Wednesday afternoon??...unless I've lost a day somewhere...lol.

No Marlywings, it was Wednesday..(Radster probably got his/her days mixed up)

Radster thanks for the info, interesting. Please don't take offence if I file it under the useful hearsay file.. I believe you must have a reason for stating it as fact(are you able to say?) just as some other posters have had information over time, but as we can't verify it we don't know it as factual(though you may).. But still interesting to keep in mind. It was reported That Police arrested him on the Wednesday after originally planning to arrest Friday, but they were concerned for his emotional state after police had been interviewing his family that week, so what you are saying may fit with this.
 
Will he or won't he appear today? ... I think he will stay in the comfy medical unit. What do you all think?
 
As I've said once before here, I know for a FACT that the arresting officer and other QPS officers went to Townsville to meet with Olivia the DAY BEFORE GBC was arrested. Not Monday, not Tuesday, not three weeks earlier ... it was WEDNESDAY. Gerard was arrested on the Thursday. I find it very difficult to not link these two events. What did Olivia say or not say that led officers to go ahead with the arrest the very next day? I find Olivia's current position very difficult to read in this context ... is she perhaps feeling guilty about her part in Gerard's arrest? Does she want him to see (or at least hear of through his lawyer) her tangible support? Even if she believes him to be guilty, she may well feel that he doesn't deserve to spend his life in jail and that he would not do anything dastardly again? She must be very, very conflicted right now. MOO.

I don't know Radster this case gets more and more bizarre and fascinating.

I think Olivia's actions are driven by her family (BC) and the need to pay the bill, even she has given evidence that has incriminated him, and if that is the case, perhaps she isn't aware of what she said.

Keeping up with the Jones, seems to be the family motto!!
 
Baden-Clay bail application

21 June 2012 , 8:21 AM by Spencer Howson

The Supreme Court will today hear a bail application for 41-year-old Gerard Baden-Clay who was last week charged with murdering his wife and unlawfully interfering with a corpse.

According to Ten News and The Courier-Mail, Gerard Baden-Clay's family has made an appeal to family and friends to raise money to defend his innocence.

Terry O'Gorman is vice president of the Queensland Council of Civil Liberties. He's a defence lawyer - though not Gerard Baden-Clay's. I spoke to him about the fundraising efforts moments ago:


Thank you Makara

IMO begging for money indicates that GBC and his current financial supporters (if there are any) have already run out of money for legal costs. It's very very early days for the case. If they are having trouble now, what will the do when the costs start piling up?

The $30,000 his legal team appear to be demanding before they turn up to court today is a tiny part of what will be an enormous bill. Where's the rest of the money going to come from?? - more begging emails?? Someone will have to pay for it if GBC and all the other BCs can't or won't pay the bills.
Then Legal Aid will step in. Then we will all be paying for his legal fees. I said when he was arrested that I wondered how long the legal specialists would hang around.
 
I mentioned last Friday my daughter works in a lab and that I asked her about beard hair.
Im old member just one that posts very little lol


:cheers:
Amee - thank you for reminding us
 
No Marlywings, it was Wednesday.. Radster thanks for the info, interesting. Please don't take offence if I file it under the useful hearsay file.. I believe you must have a reason for stating it as fact just as some other posters have had information over time, but as we can't verify it we do not know what you know as factual.. But still interesting to keep in mind.
Thanks Radster. you say its fact and i believe it. seems on here anything we say we know is just hearsay unless we can line up names addresses times places etc. some stuff we know we cannot say more about. for example it could have been a relative of yours who went but u cant put that here. seems everthing must be verified yet people believe any garbage as long as it is the paper:banghead:
 
Case closed and Bayside,

Can you remember a new member talking about forensic information a few weeks ago and her daughter worked in a lab? It was around the time the subject was on decomposition/water etc re Allison.

Try "mitochondrial" -- I don't remember the poster but I remember that word :)
 
If the bail hearing later today is in a closed court I think that GBC won't get bail. The prosecution may want to use some evidence of the crime to convince the judge of GBC's nature and aspects of the murder. To do that in an open bail hearing could predjudice the chance of finding an impartial jury later for the trial.
 
Thanks Radster. you say its fact and i believe it. seems on here anything we say we know is just hearsay unless we can line up names addresses times places etc. some stuff we know we cannot say more about. for example it could have been a relative of yours who went but u cant put that here. seems everthing must be verified yet people believe any garbage as long as it is the paper:banghead:

Squizzy1, I did reword what I said. But it is true that unless it can be verified it is hearsay..WS requires you to verify fact and if you can't it has to be classed as hearsay. I did not say at all that I did not believe radster. I said I believe they have a reason for stating it as fact. I understand the frustration believe me. (and I never meant any offence, appologies if it was taken that way).
 
I noticed Alison Sandy sidestepped the question about where she got the email.

Yes she jumped right over that question...could have been someone who works for a media outlet or someone has passed it on to media for $$$s which is so wrong!!!
 
I recall reading that he would not appear, cant remember where.

Yes, several reporters have said that it is not expected, however he has the right to appear if he wishes, but I think he is happy "in hiding" right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
99
Guests online
2,300
Total visitors
2,399

Forum statistics

Threads
602,095
Messages
18,134,640
Members
231,231
Latest member
timbo1966
Back
Top