lampshade1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
- Messages
- 260
- Reaction score
- 395
The Australian has a summary:
http://resources.news.com.au/files/2015/10/21/1227577/706255-151022murders.pdf
Notice what the summary says:
That they had to wait for a tip to put two and two together implies they didn't DNA test at least one of the bodies: otherwise they would have noticed that the two were related.
Khandalyce's body was found in July, so if they had sequenced both of the remains as a matter of course and put them into Crimtrac, they would have noticed they were related as soon as Khandalyce's results were entered.
This has been puzzling me also. It seems as if that is the first thing you would think would be done in this modern policing world of DNA & databases.