antechinusRAWR
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 93
My understanding is that ;
on the 24 th of June 2010 , a woman in a wheel chair , accompanied by a man went to the Aust. credit Union in Elizabeth to update banking records and held a conversation with the bank . This male and wheelchair female were able to convince that Bank , that the female in the wheel chair was Karlie.
Then on the 15th of Dec 2010, a female , went to a centre link appointment at Salisbury and said that she was Karlie and also had documents for herself and Khandalyce BUT they do not know , if female is the same as the one in the wheelchair , who attended the Bank , earlier that same year . [ NO MENTION OF A WHEELCHAIR at the centrelink appointment ]
its in my opinion , that they are two different woman , that is why , in the first police interview , they said that they are possibly looking for at least 2 females .
The not knowing if she was in a wheelchair makes a HUGE amount of sense & fits with everything I know/knew as a C'link employee. This may well have been Hazel. No-one documents appearance there, come to Clink with your head bandaged & a broken leg & everyone there THAT day will notice.
A week later, years later though, the only way of confirming your appearance that day would be if you handed in a medical certificate describing those treatments.
If the "two women" scenario is based only on there being nothing to prove the Clink woman attended in a wheelchair, well it's entirely possible there is no second woman.