chuppachup
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2015
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 0
Originally, it was mentioned in MSM that she died of breast cancer, but I'm having trouble finding the article.
Originally, it was mentioned in MSM that she died of breast cancer, but I'm having trouble finding the article.
We have been told by police that a woman in a wheelchair attempted to change the address details for Karlie's account at ACCU (now People's Choice), but did the police say whether that attempt was successful? Was the address changed?
Where does it say that the police stated that the woman in a wheelchair attempted to change the address details for Karlie's account? Please supply a link.
"Police believe that in June 2010, a woman in a wheelchair impersonating Ms Pearce-Stevenson attended Australian Central Credit Union at Elizabeth to update banking records."
I assume this means contact and address details.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/wynarkabelanglo-murder-bombshell-karlie-pearce-stevenson-was-victim-of-90k-identity-fraud-after-she-was-killed/story-fni6uo1m-1227584173144?sv=d35d74673d921687a59f958e3b60d267
Yes, it's your assumption. Updating an address has never been mentioned. According to Inspector Des Bray;
On 24 June 2010 a female in a wheelchair accompanied by a male person attended the Australian Central Credit Union in Elizabeth to update banking records and engage in conversations with the bank. Those people were in possession of identity documents and were able to convince the bank that in fact the female that was present was Karlie.
https://www.facebook.com/sapolicenews/videos/948059551938054/
A woman also sent text messages and called Ms Pearce-Stevenson’s mother, who died in 2012, to convince her her daughter was alive.
A woman sent text messages and called Ms Povey, who died in 2012, to convince her daughter was alive and conned her into transferring money to her account,
http://www.news.com.au/national/cri...led-two-children/story-fns0kb1g-1227587627032
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...r/news-story/4f806f185cfa776550da5222378e6595
If you read the link Panda posted it has nothing to do with the Murdoch Press. It is a statement from the NSW Police.
https://www.facebook.com/SutherlandLAC/posts/1008900522474253
I must be overtired. Everyone's losing me tonight.
I believe the police have actually said that there was a man and at least two women involved, and believe those involved retained her phone in order to dupe Karlie's family members into believing she was alive, and "It's known that the phone's message bank was accessed by the offender/s and text messages sent to the murdered woman's mother, inducing her to send money to the bank account. A woman impersonated Ms Pearce-Stevenson also had brief conversations with family members".
https://www.police.sa.gov.au/sa-police-news-assets/traffic/wynarka-belanglo-inquiry-update#.VjnwIK4rKEI
The police have already said that a woman impersonated Karlie and spoke to her mother, and "those involved" (a man and at least two women) sent text messages to her mother, so I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. I don't see what difference it makes if they spoke to another family member, or her mother - the fact remains that "those involved" used Karlie's phone (a) for proof of life and (b) to induce Karlie's mother to deposit money into her bank account.
Am I missing something?
I'm just asking when did the police state that the impersonator spoke directly to Karlie's mother? Because I am yet to read or be shown that. I'm bringing it up because there has been an awful lot of discussion about it on this forum. I myself have a very hard time imagining any circumstances whereby a mother wouldn't know the voice of her own child. But a more distant family member, maybe. I think it's important that people on this forum are careful not to misinterpret what they read and to be aware of ambiguities. God knows a lot of time has been spent accusing the press of misinterpretation. We should at least be free to call out misconceptions when we see them. Otherwise what kind of discussion are we all having?
The reason I am interested in determining whether a voice call was made to Karlie's mother, or whether she only received text messages is actually quite critical.
If she only received text messages then they may have been sent by someone of either gender.
I have a sound reason for trying to determine exactly what the police have said in regards to the contact with Karlie's mother (text or voice) <Modsnip>
None-the-less, the link has confirmed what I thought, so thanks.
47 guests!
Would like to know, if they are Australians and from where exactly.