thats what she says.....Right? Got rid of the dehydrator in case it contained traces of toxins, but still served her kids the beef Wellington with the mushroom duxelles scraped off. Go figure.
thats what she says.....Right? Got rid of the dehydrator in case it contained traces of toxins, but still served her kids the beef Wellington with the mushroom duxelles scraped off. Go figure.
To be fair, she wouldn't have known that first evening that the sickness was serious. And perhaps she hadn't started symptoms herself and didn't know about the others'.Right? Got rid of the dehydrator in case it contained traces of toxins, but still served her kids the beef Wellington with the mushroom duxelles scraped off. Go figure.
They couldn’t just have watched something on tv in another room, but still had a hug with their grandparents?Because this was a time for the adults to talk about Erin and Simon's relationship.
Makes perfect sense to me that no one would have wanted the children there at this time.
Exactly!!Or, the food dehydrator could yield evidence that she was innocent. So why would the husband's verbal attack make her chuck it away?
No wonder this case has made world news.To be fair, she wouldn't have known that first evening that the sickness was serious. And perhaps she hadn't started symptoms herself and didn't know about the others'.
It’s another hole in her stories. She said she supposedly gave samples of the meal up for testing, but then chucked the dehydrator. Why?yep
guilt and PANIC
She maybe wouldn't have felt comfortable for them to possibly overhear herself being judged worthy or not.They couldn’t just have watched something on tv in another room, but still had a hug with their grandparents?
She needed them totally out of the way for their safety IMO.
Right, and I agree. But if she had poisoned them, on what planet would she serve the kids the same meal? Scraped off mushrooms or not?To be fair, she wouldn't have known that first evening that the sickness was serious. And perhaps she hadn't started symptoms herself and didn't know about the others'.
Where is the info coming from that this was going to be a hard conversation or that Erin was or wasn't good enough please??She maybe wouldn't have felt comfortable for them to possibly overhear herself being judged worthy or not.
There may have likely been some raised voices at a meal like this.
I would feel the exact same way.
No way I would take the chance of them hearing anyone saying if they thought I was worthy or good enough. How very demeaning.
It is demeaning and it is bootless. If they did decide she was worthy, they can't make Simon go back. I think we don't know what was going on there.She maybe wouldn't have felt comfortable for them to possibly overhear herself being judged worthy or not.
There may have likely been some raised voices at a meal like this.
I would feel the exact same way.
No way I would take the chance of them hearing anyone saying if they thought I was worthy or good enough. How very demeaning.
It doesn’t add up. I read in an article upthread that she was the one to end the relationship with her ex. And she said she had maintained an amicable relationship with her in-laws.Where is the info coming from that this was going to be a hard conversation or that Erin was or wasn't good enough please??
Because I have only seen Erin say these were the loveliest people and had only been very good to her.
Not that I buy what she is selling, but this is the only info I have seen about their dynamic.
These people are dead.
Its not very victim friendly to insinuate that they were difficult or contentious.
That is the demeaning thing going on here. Not factual IMO
Various angles have been reported by MSM in the last week. The source for the lunch being about mediation appears to have been a friend of SP though it's not clear IMO if other sources were also used. Apart from the brief statements to reporters camped on her door step, this today is the first detailed statement EP has released. MooIt doesn’t add up. I read in an article upthread that she was the one to end the relationship with her ex. And she said she had maintained an amicable relationship with her in-laws.
So why would they be considering whether she’s ”worthy” or not anyway? For what?
I agree. ‘Worthy?’ They had 2 teenage kids together and were separated. What would be the point? Was the ex waiting around hanging to hear if his parents and Aunty thought she was worthy of getting back together with? I doubt it.It doesn’t add up. I read in an article upthread that she was the one to end the relationship with her ex. And she said she had maintained an amicable relationship with her in-laws.
So why would they be considering whether she’s ”worthy” or not anyway? For what?
It comes from MSM. If you read back here for the week between 6 Aug and now you'll see "a friend" of Simon Patterson is credited as the source Imoo.Where is the info coming from that this was going to be a hard conversation or that Erin was or wasn't good enough please??
Because I have only seen Erin say these were the loveliest people and had only been very good to her.
Not that I buy what she is selling, but this is the only info I have seen about their dynamic.
These people are dead.
Its not very victim friendly to insinuate that they were difficult or contentious.
That is the demeaning thing going on here. Not factual IMO
A source close to Simon, who has not been out in public since the tragedy, told Daily Mail Australia his mate had no interest in getting back together with the mother of his two children.It comes from MSM. If you read back here for the week between 6 Aug and now you'll see "a friend" of Simon Patterson is credited as the source Imoo.
We have Erin's public Statements, then we have the info disseminated through MSM via 'a friend' of Simon Patterson according to those articles. SP himself has made no public statements as far as I'm aware. It's up to readers IMo to decide what to believe at this point, what to take with half a bowl of salt or to reserve judgement until police provide more information post investigation. Or none of the above! MooOn the various accounts given, I'm struggling to see what the mediation/intervention could have been about. She implies she didn't want to reconcile--she makes a point of saying she told Simon so last year. Simon, IIRC, is also reported as not wanting to reconcile. It's an amicable separation with the children having access to both parents. They had a good relationship with their grandparents and Erin was keen to facilitate that. What was the conflict?
Absolutely. I think I can only reserve judgement until we know more.We have Erin's public Statements, then we have the info disseminated through MSM via 'a friend' of Simon Patterson according to those articles. SP himself has made no public statements as far as I'm aware. It's up to readers IMo to decide what to believe at this point, what to take with half a bowl of salt or to reserve judgement until police provide more information post investigation. Or none of the above! Moo