https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/...ss-as-serial-killer-still-roams-free-1.149685
There was always a hint of DNA with CG. Why would an organisation set up after CG's death buy a DNA analyser if there was no DNA.
Quoted from the article above.
"Almost immediately afterwards the Secure Community Foundation was set up by Denis Glennon's colleagues to raise money for extra resources to help the police investigation.
The funds paid for a DNA analyser to scan the oral swabs given by the hundreds interviewed after the murder."
Maybe I am missing something, but the DNA situation has always confused me, and this only adds to that confusion. (Not you, DRT, but the information).
If they had DNA from CG originally then why weren't they able to link it to KK straight away? Police dismissed any link to that even when profilers were interested, and didn't link the DNA until years later.
If they had DNA from CG originally, why was it considered a breakthrough when the body/artifacts were re-examined many years later and they found something they'd previously overlooked that they got DNA from? That breakthrough sounded to me like the first DNA they had?
BUT on the other hand
If they didn't have any DNA originally, why swab all the taxi drivers? I suppose it could have been for future purposes, but didn't they actually rule them out?
And now, this article add to that. If they didn't have DNA originally, why the need for a special analysis machine?
So did they have some DNA to begin with, but it didn't link to KK, and it was only when they found something else on CG that they got DNA that did? But how could that possibly work? Is there more than one person's DNA on CG?
Or was there DNA on JR that we never heard about? But then why didn't that link to KK as the DNA on CG does? If it doesn't link to KK, doesn't that suggests a different perpetrator?
Apologies if I am missing something obvious. If so, please do point it out. I'm either legitimately baffled or losing my marbles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk