Spooks-R-Us
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
- Messages
- 1,996
- Reaction score
- 11
No such thing as spousal privilege. A hostile witness will answer but not expand.
Ok great
Squashed that urban myth in one foul swoop!
Thanks JanWA
No such thing as spousal privilege. A hostile witness will answer but not expand.
Sorry, no poetry from me, I'm a computer guy, poems don't make sense, logic makes sense.
Putting myself in the CSK's shoes. (Not that that is a good place to be). I have a body in the boot or back seat of my car. From my military training with life-size dummies I know how awkward lifting a body in and out of a car can be.(If you need to draw an analogy, think of 7 or more 10kg (22lb) bags of potatoes put into a pair of overalls.)
Just my conjecture which I just want to put out there. Might help put things into perspective or help someone look at a different angle.
Awesome poetry all.
I do like Falco's points and Spooks and 7S007s on DV.
I know we've linked WCE games, WAFL games, public holidays and so on, but have we checked what the moon was doing?
Falco120 makes a good point about torchlight. I don't think know if it was moonlit will help find SS, but might be a connection?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In a recent discussion with a cluey friend, my friend asked the question:
Why did both ex wives (EE and CGE) leave the marital home while BRE stayed behind?
Usually wives and any children remain in the family home after a couple splits and husbands move out.
There must have been a really good reason why the ex wives left. And usually wives leave the home when there's a domestic violence (DV) issue, risk, or threat.
There's a concerning pattern that occurred when BRE experienced relationship breakdowns.
In our opinion DV was an issue in this scenario.
What do you think?
Edit for clarity: Do you think BRE abused his two wives? Did domestic violence contribute to the marital splits?
[emoji15]
without nudging debate,
i would just like to state
that i gave it my time
& found NO post with rhyme??
thus i pose
there be naught but prose,
nor evidence subliminal
of anything criminal
FURTHER to which?
in the versing, a hitch;
fam&vics of "th'accused"
would, i DOUBT, be amused;
(this is, i recall,
a most serious matter
and not one for pages
of frivolous chatter
nor musings of knitwits'
superfluous natter,
empty vessels abound)
but HARK !!!
not a sound???
what IS that???
_BEHOLD!_
is it the "silence", i'm told,
of where there is gold???
...with a little less yakk,
might we re-rail the track?
(please, 4give my critique,
for timeout i DON'T seek)
[emoji17]
I think your poem is brilliant BreVeTTe and all the others who have contributed poetry, great. Not nice being singled out, but point taken. Thanks all, been interesting on here. Lamp out.
I think your poem is brilliant BreVeTTe and all the others who have contributed poetry, great. Not nice being singled out, but point taken. Thanks all, been interesting on here. Lamp out.
You left out the part about him being a steroid abusing, cross dressing, clown impersonating wife basher with a bung leg.
While a long winded trial we await,
Here we post our ideas and debate.
Of late, besides the odd Bessie rebuke,
Or outlandish claim by the Spook,
This forum has reached a stalemate.
Please explain your reference to a bung leg.....
I must have missed that in the thread....
Wasn't there a fairly extensively argued theory that various images of BRE walked with one foot turned inwards?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks Anna
I missed that discussion
But I had noticed BRE's turned in foot!
Hip problems or muscle imbalance?
What was the overall outcome of that discussion please?
It kind of mercifully died out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Although there was a lady on here who I haven't seen posting for ages who was all over it. I think she was convinced it was MM - as in that BRE had this funny walk and BRE was MM and MM had a funny walk.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk