IMO - my gut feeling is that the alleged CSK derived pleasure, even sexual pleasure from torturing and harming the victims.
Plus IMO the alleged CSK is a planner, and a controlled and organised SK, and a master of deception and evading suspicion.
The fact the accused didn't say a word during entire KK incident is a very telling piece of 'evidence'.
It's very difficult to NOT speak in normal daily scenarios- and even especially more difficult to NOT speak and impart instructions when trying to force another person to do something against their will. Near on impossible.
Reports tha the perpertrator whover he is , did not say a word during the entire KK incident could also indicate that he is quite adept at dealing with drunk people, and knows from past experience that is a waste of time to even talk ,give instructions or try to reason with them.
This was the theory explained to the men employed to work as Hotel and Club doormen around that time - ( pre the widespread proliferation of mobile phones). If a drunk needed to be evicted they were simply grabbed firmly from behind and frogmarched out the door , -no explanation given, -pointless trying to argue or reason with a drunk was time tested theory. The patron could argue and rant all they liked once they were out the door, and on the street.
In fact there was a brief craze amongst some of the more ****gish elements of the industry for applying a sleeper hold unnanounced from behind on inebriated alleged "troublemakers " which culminated in the infamous Greg Matthews "Hippy Club"" eviction incident where the cricketer won a substantial out of court settlement and Bar managers afterwards forbade the practice fearfull of litigation. KK victim was selected, stalked, then silently attacked from behind.....
Agree that the CSK whover he may be is a planner...and i think a certain element of this planning included making it his business to be around innocent young people who were out carefree, partying in the early hours,-.whilst he was dead sober and plying his sick trade of stalking, groping , assaulting and abducting his victims whose judgement and recollection was imparied by alcohol consumption.
An interesting comparison is with Melbournes " Hot Chocolate" rapist and abductor whose M.O. was to prey on drunken and vulnerable young women by offering them rides home as they left Melbourne Nightclubs with dozens of reported victims. Unreported incidents possibly as high as 100. So at the time was definetly an effective strategy for these sick criminal rapists.