I think MSM may be mistaken, Karen's funeral notice says that her service is tomorrow (Tuesday) in Whorouly. At a reserve, so it sounds as though they will be ready for the anticipated large number of attendees.
A service to honour the life of Karen Maria Chetcuti will be held at the Whorouly Recreation Reserve on TUESDAY (Feb 2, 2016) commencing at 11.30 am.
http://www.tatefunerals.com.au/home...tcuti-karen-m-funeral-details-to-be-confirmed
So I'm guessing he hasn't said anything as to why?
http://www.theguardian.com/australi...-longer-relying-on-parole-system-report-finds
While this report isn't directly applicable to this case, it probably will be when Cardamone applies for parole in the long distance future ( hopefully) .. its worth a read because it outlines a few items that were applicable to Cardamone in the past..
'“I think judges have lost a degree of confidence that parolees will be released at their earliest eligibility date, which used to occur some time ago,” Freiberg told Guardian Australia.
“I think they like the fact that they can control the time and the conditions of a prisoner release. The parole board has become much more cautions with its release conditions.”
I don't know why the hell anyone should be released at 'the earliest possible date'.. can anyone give me a good reason why this should be even considered rational?
http://www.theguardian.com/australi...apply-for-parole-because-of-strict-conditions ( of interest ) and....
http://www.theguardian.com/australi...l-be-back-within-two-years-victoria-forecasts
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/la...d/news-story/135c25f9bce57ee4be35e0c3ae6eae88
From that article.
The convicted criminal, who was on parole after having his original sentence for a serious offence reduced at appeal, allegedly returned a positive drug test when reporting to Corrections Victoria, and on further investigation, police claim they found child *advertiser censored* on his mobile phone.
A court heard the images were of his then partners five-year-old daughter, naked in various poses on a bed and in the bath.
No points for guessing who this is [emoji45]
I guess it was the poor woman who hasn't been the same since, HD...
My question. .. what does an 'offender' have to do, to be 'offensive ' enough to have their parole rescinded?.. here we have drug positive tests, and child *advertiser censored* , of a child of his partner at the time... how offensive can it get? .. who isn't offended by this? .. I am, and I expect the people in the Parole Board, who are paid by my taxes to do this job to be as equally offended.. I don't think I am requiring a very high and unattainable standard , ,either.. .
Both these actions are offensive in someone not on parole, but on parole? for RAPE? violent rape? . .. and not out more than 6 months on 'parole' and chucking positive drug tests and child *advertiser censored*? .. wtf??
In his first Appeal hearing for the rape back in 2006... this was one of the charges he was convicted on.... Count 8 - Threat to kill: two years and six months’ imprisonment with six months ordered to be served cumulatively on Count 5.
this was point 42 of his Appeal Hearing... 42 The applicant was well supported by his family and strong references of support were provided by family and business associates.
well.. where are these people now? these people who gave 'strong references, ' and support, by family and business associates??
none of it makes any logic at all. .... either people were manifestly deceived, or were deliberately misdirecting the parole board at the time. .... it was plain he was prepared to kill, and all the 'strong support' and 'strong references' should be invalid in the light of that knowledge. ...
Are you able to go Humdinger?
(Look out for those caterpillars, they're nasty little suckers!)