I also believe that the interview was edited. Near the end of the interview I’m sure I can hear AS voice underneath that of MC or is it my ears playing up again?
I believe your ears are working well, there were a lot of fades of MC’s voice with AS talking over the top. I initially thought it was because it was difficult to understand MC’s accent but maybe there were other reasons to edit
I noticed the same thing. I felt AS was improvising and reading the situation. It felt very weird to me when MC invited AS to visit her in Luxembourg-- as if she didn't want AS to blame Luxembourg for anything! Or as if the two women had met at a spa and were making small talk. I believe that interview was conducted with kid gloves, and AS felt just like @TootsieFootsie said, that she was lucky to get what she got.
Possibly because the police are trying to get him for murder, not theft. There’s no information in the public domain that directly implicates him as a person who harmed Marion. I know we all think that (and I believe that too) but evidence in a criminal matter needs to be stronger than what was presented at inquest. The only thing they can get him on at inquest now is that he is a liar and an unreliable witness - they could not prove he had harmed Marion. Not yet. Charging him on a greater offence is probably the priority of a police investigation. Honestly I feel that charging him with the lesser crimes would indicate they’ve exhausted their options to charge him on the greater offences, and I hope police are not there yet.
It might sound un-Christian and a bit vengeful but I do hope he lives to a 100 so he can have a number of years reflecting on what a nasty deviant he has been throughout his criminal life. JMO by the way!
wonder if they could lift fingerprints off what was left of the books?
As we sew we reap. I think that’s very Christian.
I'd assume it's a jurisdiction thing, ie the theft took place in Belgium, so NSW police can't charge him for something outside of their jurisdiction.
