I was surprised this remained to be fair.
I see what they're saying but they are entitled to their opinions and from what I am sensing reading the comments is that they are upset that he was a pilot and is suspected of doing this. And they are not hiding the fact that they are upset so I actually think that's a noble thing, good on them.
I thought I read that the nearest campers were kilometers away. So it was a pretty desolate spot.
Two possibilities either destroyed it or sold it. How could the trailer be destroyed. It was metal for the most part. Could the trailer have been pushed into some body of water? Could it be at the bottom of water somewhere? If it was taken to a junkyard wouldn't that show up on some kind of registry with ID being used by the person taking it to the junyard for destruction? That would narrow that down the junkyard part, but it doesn't seem likely, though, its not discreet enough. Then maybe bottom of water somewhere. Melted down is possible but it would have to be somewhere remote where no one see it being melted down. MOO.
Taken apart bit by bit can be done. But the thing with that would be parts would have to be souldered off by flame, sawed or chain sawed. If this was done at home wouldn't the killer's family know somehow? But also I wonder if the family would ask why is the trailer being taken apart. So that's why I was thinking perhaps somewhere remote. The trailer looks average sized as trailers go so I guess if it was going to be taken apart bit by bit it would be perhaps in a garage when family wasn't around? But then wouldn't the family ask where the trailer is and see it in the garage. Maybe they wouldn't have known the significance of the destruction so didn't care. Its possible it was taken apart bit by bit in a garage where others didn't realize the significance. But then if the trailer was used often in trips by the family then wouldn't they ask what happened with the trailer or wonder why it was being destroyed? These are the questions that come to my mind if it wasn't taken somewhere remote to be destroyed. It doesn't look like GL bought another similar type of trailer. I could be wrong.
No problems at all. The sunset would have been a few minutes earlier in the valley than the time listed on any website due to the height of the hills on the western side of the valley, but it would be only the matter of a few minutes ( 5 or so) in my estimation. This is why I don't think he was flying the drone after the Ham radio net as there would not have been enough light for very long. I believe he was flying the drone around 4.30 as others have mentioned.
It is quite a large area with plenty of bush between the well used campsites, so a tent on fire could easily be seen by others (remote from the direct area) as just a large campfire. The smell of burning plastic etc could be put down to "hoons" burning plastic rubbish in the campfire. Unfortunately this sort of behavior is becoming the norm rather than the exception in the bush. It wont be too long before we all get locked out of these areas because of the idiots that don't understand how to treat the environment (leave no trace except your footprints).
Yes at tleast the website was approximate so that gave me an indication. I absolutely agree that the fire was meant to destroy evidence, its very upsetting. I don't know RH nor CC but empathize with them.
