I totally understand that the defence and the crown may wish to keep various matters suppressed, in order not the prejudice a fair trial and also to minimise the risk of a mistrial - specifically the jury being "contaminated" by exposure to information not adduced in court. However, the principle of open justice requires that justice is done by the accused and the victims, AND that the public see that it is done, is absolutely crucial. This applies not only to the trial itself but to any committal hearing. People need to see that committals are only made when there is sufficiently strong case and are not used frivolously by police.Accused camper killer makes bid to withhold 'explosive' details
Lawyers for a number of media organisations have challenged the suppressionwww.bordermail.com.au
Lead investigator Detective Senior Constable Brett Florence is expected to be cross-examined by Lynn's barrister Dermot Dann when a committal hearing continues in Melbourne Magistrates Court on Monday.
Among the evidence Detective Florence and others are expected to be questioned about are Lynn's formal record of interview - taken over four days between November 22 and 25, 2021.
Magistrate Brett Sonnet questioned what the prejudice was in media waiting until a possible trial to report on the contents of Lynn's police interview.
But Corey Jankie, representing the ABC, said that wasn't the legal test for suppression orders, noting the legal assumption is that all material may be published.
Media reporting of the case demonstrated the substantial public interest in this case, he said.
Sam White, for the Nine Network, added that the law required only the "bare minimum" to be suppressed to prevent prejudice to an accused.
"We say the public has a right to know about the conduct of these proceedings," he said.
At the present time in Australia, and specifically Victoria, the so called "freedom protesters" were alleging the police were misusing their powers to frivolously charge people who are protesting "lock downs" or advocating protests against these public health measures. This is a serious - and false - accusation against police. But many people believed them and confidence in the system was weakened. So, for my two pennies worth, the process during the committal needs to be as open as possible too.
In my experience, juries are very good, in Australia, of placing matters aside and focusing only on the information provided in court.