Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You may want to update the banner for WS - it’s still showing her name and an error when clickingAfter more than 30 hours of interrogation by detectives, Terence Darrell Kelly was charged with various offences and will front Carnarvon Magistrate’s Court on Thursday afternoon.
All previous threads discussing this case have been pulled due to the victim's name being contained throughout.
Although MSM is still using the victim's name, it is Websleuths policy NOT to do so.
Members may link to MSM articles related to the case, and the accused's name may be used but the victim's name may NOT be. If you quote anything from MSM, please ensure this minor child's name is changed to initials only.
Under Australian law, now that this individual has been charged, the case is under sub judice.
Please note: Under sub-judice, the following is not allowed:
Anything that may prejudice the accused’s right to a fair trial
Any suggestions or direct accusations that the accused is either guilty or innocent (i.e. the accused cannot be called "the killer", it has to be "the accused", the "alleged killer" or "the defendant")
A defendant’s previous history of any offences
Scandalizing the court (disparaging judges/lawyers, any officer of the Court)
Broadcasting anything about proceedings which happen in the jury's absence.
Any non compliance with an Order of the court
Please do not post anything that violates the above principles. Breaching sub judice can result in charges of contempt of court.
Thank you.
If we’re not allowed to mention the victim, mods might wish to pull the main banner announcing her safe return.
Besides the abduction charge, wouldn't another charge be false imprisonment of a minor? Deprivation of liberty? I imagine his charges would be pretty stacked.
I've never heard anything like it, from start to finish, Primo.. the dolls were right off my radar. Whodathunk??Besides the abduction, which is reprehensible, his fb 'family' and stealing pics is pretty disturbing. He portrays himself as a caring parent and a stud. He's obsessed with young families and he's liked pages about missing children. A real mixed bag we've got here.
Besides the abduction, which is reprehensible, his fb 'family' and stealing pics is pretty disturbing. He portrays himself as a caring parent and a stud. He's obsessed with young families and he's liked pages about missing children. A real mixed bag we've got here.
Yes that obviously would be another charge but why keep it quiet?
where did you see their reactions? I missed thatSeeing the people whose photos he stole react to seeing how their photos were used was … just wow. Icky.
Wow - yes, that is so intense. I missed that too...where did you see their reactions? I missed that
where did you see their reactions? I missed that
Perhaps having withdrawals or anxiety or scared of going back to jail?
I said a similar thing a few pages back now. And I do wonder if this is a possibility. I know the mother said she would never leave the tent on her own, but they hadn’t been camping since the new baby was born, and she is 7 months old. I wonder if in the time since the family had been camping, (name withdrawn by me) had grown up a bit since, and I wonder if she would leave the tent on her own accord? Tents are small, they don’t have much stimulus for a child who is energetic! And again I know the said the tent was open too high for the child to reach, i wonder how certain can anyone be that the tent wasn’t pulled so the zip went up farther, or that the zipper wasn’t touched at all in after they discovered she was missing.
The fact she’s up playing with toys around the same time as when she went missing to me is a massive coincidence, and it just might be that, a coincidence, but it also might not be. Being energetic and trusting as the police said she is, that can be a combination that leads to kids leaving things like tents etc. IMO
It was still a little confusing. Had to read it twice. They closed in ON a car as well as while “in a car”.
The thing is to not assume anything.
Yes that obviously would be another charge but why keep it quiet?
My theory is that he saw her bike outside the tent. The parents mentioned it in an interview that they took her bike along.How did he know there was a child in the tent. It was almost dark when they arrived. We haven’t heard that he was seen at the campsite. Will be interesting to know what happened here. Did he just open random tents hoping to find a kid, and the first one he opens there is one! How far away did he have to park his car from the campsite to sneak in and not be heard? Wonder if he went there often. It’s crazy she was found only 7 minutes from her home. moo
I don’t feel that this was Granny’s collection. Some of the FB profilesgo back 10 years ago.Yes that is what I predicted a day ago that this collection could have been started by his grandmother. Then he decided he would like a living doll.