NatalieJones
Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2016
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 0
In the Simon Gittany trial, the lack of fingerprints on the glass barrier were a crucial part of the case - problaby the most damning piece of evidence. In the Tostee trial, why has the Crown brushed over the fact that only a single handprint of Warriena's was found on the balcony rail? If she actually climbed over, her finger/hand prints would surely have to be all over it. The Crown case that she climbed over is not even consistent with the evidence the presented. If I was on the jury I would be very confused about why the Crown has blatantly ignored crucial forensic evidence. Makes one wonder what other evidence was ignored by the Crown.
The difference between the Gittany trial and Tostee trial is that the Crown wanted to secure a conviction in the Gittany trial.
The difference between the Gittany trial and Tostee trial is that the Crown wanted to secure a conviction in the Gittany trial.