Underbelly
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2012
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 155
What evidence?So if the evidence after 7+ years does not indicate a cover up, what else could it indicate in regards to a theory around the FFC and FGM?
What evidence?So if the evidence after 7+ years does not indicate a cover up, what else could it indicate in regards to a theory around the FFC and FGM?
I don't recall ever seeing a pic of them together. Can you remember where or when?
Or was it a side-by-side done by MSM with 2 different photo's?
I recall one photo of PS beside a photo of Frank Abbott. Talk about guilt by association, media style.
Here it is: William Tyrrell: Frank Abbott's phone conversations with a priest revealed | Daily Mail Online
Added to # 914.
I'm suggesting that something such as William being taken by a stranger could have happened, but some people seem to have ruled that out because something else is more likely. Hopefully the cops aren't thinking that way, although they do have a history of target fixation.I'm not sure what you mean Underbelly when you say "whatever happened on that day was unlikely"? All I was pointing out was that when considering probabilities (as per published statistics), it is more likely that William died in the hands of his carers (from many possible causes) than he was abducted by a random stranger. Both options are still possible, but the former scenario is more probable. And there will always be cases (like CS') that defy the statistics. That's why we talk in terms of probabilities not certainties
I’m not sure- but my point was the special reward still stands when previous POI’s have been named and investigated and no one gave the sufficient evidence to lead to the reward.
Hopefully one day, it does.
Ok , so say the FF came out today ( against court orders mind you ) & told the world who they are, where they live, their occupations, their family tree etc what would that change??
I just don't get the whole hatred towards them for not being named publicly![]()
Is it because people can't throw their pitch forks at them publicly??
From what I have observed ( yes I know who they are, I know what they look like ) & IMO they are just a normal suburban couple who tried to give children a better life IMO
I would hate to see how much more they would have suffered ( & I believe they have truly suffered alot from groups / people who do know their identity & where they live etc ) who have gone to great lengths to do harm to them IMO
Feeling all warm and fuzzy about these people doesnt change whats occured.Ok , so say the FF came out today ( against court orders mind you ) & told the world who they are, where they live, their occupations, their family tree etc what would that change??
I just don't get the whole hatred towards them for not being named publicly
Is it because people can't throw their pitch forks at them publicly??
From what I have observed ( yes I know who they are, I know what they look like ) & IMO they are just a normal suburban couple who tried to give children a better life IMO
I would hate to see how much more they would have suffered ( & I believe they have truly suffered alot from groups / people who do know their identity & where they live etc ) who have gone to great lengths to do harm to them IMO
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/t...ws-story/65a0ecde5f265bf69beacef17bdfc066?amp
Paraphrased from above article
I noted in this article that it reports that their was no evidence found of William from the FGM house or the bush they searched back in the end of 2021
The interesting thing about FA reportedly not having an alibi, is that he claimed to have one with his daughter.
Ok , so say the FF came out today ( against court orders mind you ) & told the world who they are, where they live, their occupations, their family tree etc what would that change??
I have tried to replicate this angle and I really don't think it is physically possible to do![]()
I have been away since the CSK case and came back to post something about missing woman Revelle Balmain then this discussion caught my eye because I was catching up on the case and it related to something I was thinking about.
One of the issues I see with the anonymity of the FPs is that it stopped other people from coming forward about them if they knew something. I don't mean friends and family; I mean someone who may have seen something. This is not to presume that there was something to be seen. But in cases like this, usually parents are known, and POIs have their pictures published, often with the specific request for people to come forward if they have seen something.
I'll use the example of a car. What if a person had seen one of the cars they used to take a trip out that morning that has never been mentioned? It might have been a tourist who spotted it on a main road. But they have no chance of knowing that if they have no information about the people or their car. Or what if one of the FPs went somewhere and did something odd a year after the investigation and someone saw them? They won't know what they have been looking at to come forward. Not that I am suggesting, of course, that these actually happened, just that they're plausible situations where the investigation may have missed things as a result of the anonymity.
Yes, it would have meant probably thousands more tips, but that's what happens in these cases.
It doesn't matter to me who they are per se; but the pictures and information about their vehicles was IMO important.
That's true, yes. I wonder how he could have been looking up at her face at that angle while she was also physically taking the picture (the camera was much lower and down to the side)? Unless she has a go-go gadget arm or had the camera on a long stick that she was holding down at her side? Otherwise, IMO, it would have been quite difficult to achieve. I also wonder why she felt the need to explain the odd angle of the photo in the 2015 60 Minutes interview with Michael Usher when he hadn't asked her about it. This struck me as unusual. All MOO of course!Kids and pets look at the face and not the camera.
Well yes, of course! I'm not advocating for people to break it so the information gets out there. I was just offering my thoughts on this issue.There are definitely restrictions with it. I don't think anyone here would disagree with that.
But there's not much anyone can do about it. It is the ruling of FACS, and the Supreme Court, and the Coroners Court. Whether we like it or not, I'm afraid.
I don't know if the FACS portion still stands (if they are no longer foster parents and it won't affect the minor child), but the Coroners Court ruling still stands at this point in time.
<modsnip> IMO. I'll wait for the official outcome.
BTW. Has the ground underneath PS's new pool ever been dug up? Just curious, as his wife was backing out about that time. IMO.
BTW. Has the ground underneath PS's new pool ever been dug up? Just curious, as his wife was backing out about that time. IMO.
Just like they did at BS’s . Perhaps they should do the same at all past POIs just to be fair, including PS. IMO.Not sure, but i predict there will be some demolition works occurring at the former foster carers previous place of residence very soon. If there's not already.