Serenanicole
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2017
- Messages
- 133
- Reaction score
- 794
Has there been some type of organised crime that the FF has been involved in unrelated to William?
of course. But the Crime Commission doesn't routinely involve themselves in ~normal~ murders, only those associated with organised crime*.
The only thing I can think of is if the police do suspect the foster carers, then the money they've raised through the Where's William campaigns might be seen as a 'proceeds of crime' situation, and the Crime Commission does have under its purview, the recovery of assets of crime. Running a campaign to raise money to help find a child you'd murdered would be fraud.
I'm writing hypothetically here and am not accusing anyone of anything, I'm just putting that forward as maybe where the police are going with all this.
*yes there are other cases eg cases where there has been a police inquiry
I wonder why it is though that he has been charged by the unsolved homicide detective who is involved in Williams case?
Bill Spedding was charged with his alleged historical child abuse offences by Strike Force Rosann detectives.
Those charges were unrelated to William's case.
I am also curious why Daily Mail is showing pictures and referencing TJ. A previous poster had a theory that WT may have have been handed over to someone, all of which was prearranged.
Correct. However it was when he was one of the main suspects in Williams disappearance.( my apologies to South Aussie - this was not meant to have been inserted to the quote above.
Thanks. It seems the DMO has published every picture they have of Det Sgt Andrew Lonergan.
'Two days?' Magistrate Moody responded, 'two days is a lot of time to ask for and we are very, very tight in the (court) diary.
'That does not look a two day matter to me.
'Sergeant, do you agree with that?,' the Magistrate asked the police prosecutor, 'How many witnesses are there for the defence?'
Pity we don't get to know the response to that question.
Yes I do think SouthAussie. There shouldn’t have been a question mark in my statement. it was in response to a poster and others that is questioning the connection between the alleged mistruths by the FF to the NSW crime commission and William Tyrell case. <modsnip>So, you don't think that applying pressure to the POI's (FM) husband would simultaneously apply pressure to the FM?
Secret recordings to be played at hearing as William Tyrrell's foster father denies giving false evidence
'both parents have been accused of common assault'
I thought it was just FM?
So, you don't think that applying pressure to the POI's (FM) husband would simultaneously apply pressure to the FM?
So to clarify, the theory is that Foster mother and Foster grandmother decided to give their 3 yr old child to a pedophile, so they didn't have to care for him anymore?Motive, I think: FM felt completely overwhelmed with raising the little boy. If she had said the truth, her husband (who was William's loving dad, afaik) might have turned away from her, and that she feared. So, maybe FGM had an idea for help and wanted to manage the disappearing of the "little devil". FGM knew a lot of men in her area, who were married men with partners and families, but also partly involved in pedo affairs. I believe, FGM asked one of these men for help. She couldn't have asked a woman.
FM must not necessarily have known details of the disappearing, but was grateful for her mother's help perhaps. I can imagine, FM had to be there in Kendall at Benaroon Drive for a certain time (suddenly on early Friday morning), William had to be dressed with something red from shoulder to feet and had to play outside - maybe FM didn't know any more (or she did). FGM had the plan and was leading from behind. She didn't love him very much, I believe, and she didn't care, what would happen to him later.
Alive or not: Idk, if little W is alive or not. Might be, he is. Hopefully he is not alive for being the "toy" of any man.
All IMO and MOO
It’s my understanding that it’s the FFFC who has been named as the POI ( not FFMC ) .
in consideration of your question tho SA, I personally do think ‘applying pressure’ to ‘associates’ of a POI could be considered as worth a try, for any numbers of reasons. Eg, said ‘associate’ may perhaps knowingly or unknowingly be aware of vital information that could potentially be ‘dislodged’; said ‘associate’ may have been covering for POI & may see wisdom in coming clean / encouraging POI to come clean - that’s my thoughts
So to clarify, the theory is that Foster mother and Foster grandmother decided to give their 3 yr old child to a pedophile, so they didn't have to care for him anymore?
That is hard for me to believe.
I agree this is hard to believe. It is very very hard to believe any of the theories thus far regarding a potential involvement by the FM in Williams’ disappearance.
Everything about this is hard to believe. IMO.
We have been conditioned to the idea that William was abducted by a pedophile that brazenly walked on that property and took him for over 7 years. It takes a while for some to get their head around this new information and direction of the investigation.
My own personal opinion is that trying to make sense of an opportunistic abduction was next to impossible. However, this new information is sounding more logical to me.
Just to throw in also, the information that has become public during the inquest that GJ was aware of but continued to publically pursue other persons makes me angry. As a NSW citizen, I feel duped.
All just my opinion.