Yes I understand about the photograph however I am asking if anyone else actually witnessed him from the time he left Sydney to the time he disappeared? He may also be renting but he owns a business and could borrow against that. Maybe legal aid until some financial arrangements can be made.
The business to me looks like an owner operated one, so I suggest that without him working it he may actually have no business to borrow against. Would anyone call him for repairs if he was a POI? He also needs to be earning an income to make repayments I would think. Legal aid doesn't necessarily mean he will have a bad lawyer, IMO.
I am not yet convinced he is guilty of anything and generally a person who offends against children to the suggested degree would not just have only 2 victims (on the same occasion) and then never again, would he? I hope the police have more evidence than they have released so far.
The business to me looks like an owner operated one, so I suggest that without him working it he may actually have no business to borrow against. Would anyone call him for repairs if he was a POI? He also needs to be earning an income to make repayments I would think. Legal aid doesn't necessarily mean he will have a bad lawyer, IMO.
I am not yet convinced he is guilty of anything and generally a person who offends against children to the suggested degree would not just have only 2 victims (on the same occasion) and then never again, would he? I hope the police have more evidence than they have released so far.