I am wondering where our minds would lead to, if we started a list of 'facts'.. leaving out all of the conjecture. For example, put little point form notes in a list, sort them later into perhaps a timeline of some kind, and then try very hard to look at the list objectively, pretending we haven't seen all of the discrepancies and theories and opinions and etc., and just base thoughts on what is actually known, or said by those that actually 'know'... ie, if there is a direct quote in MSM, we *should* be able to trust its accuracy, hopefully!, whatever has come out of the mouths of the neighbours who saw/heard/witnessed, searchers, detectives, family, etc. For example, say we have Mrs. W quoted as saying she left her house at 9am (90 minutes prior to the disappearance time).. we could take that as a 'fact' (even if it isn't true, because there is no way of knowing if a person quoted happens to be lying). We'd have in the end, a list of 'facts', and if we looked only at those, where would our minds go? If we list only the things that were actually said by those people in the know (whether it is written in MSM or stated in an interview video/soundtrack), we'd perhaps have a lot of stuff to consider, but without the riffraff.
