Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #44

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
katydid23 said:
PS's testimony was really sketchy. And he had the perfect location and circumstances to commit this awful deed.

But he has no prior history of sexual crimes, as far as we know. It seems odd that a man never acts out for 60 plus years, and then suddenly kidnaps and kills a young neighbor child. It seems so unlikely to me.
Click to expand...

I read most paedophiles offend many times before they are caught.

Since William was taken PS has lost his wife, lives alone and I’m doubtful he works to occupy himself to stimulate his brain so I’m thinking it’s fair he’s lost some memory.

I’d like to know PSs trade when he worked.
Poor bugger has aged a lot but if he’s guilty he deserves every ounce of hell.
 
they'll get you said:
I read most paedophiles offend many times before they are caught.

Since William was taken PS has lost his wife, lives alone and I’m doubtful he works to occupy himself to stimulate his brain so I’m thinking it’s fair he’s lost some memory.

I’d like to know PSs trade when he worked.
Poor bugger has aged a lot but if he’s guilty he deserves every ounce of hell.
Click to expand...
His daughter lives with him now
 
SouthAussie said:
Interesting that Ch7 dug up this video segment of Spedding driving a van with no lettering on it.
I seem to recall seeing it for the first time a very long time ago.
Click to expand...
I recall that when BS first came into the spotlight, there was lettering on his van (it said, "Speddos" - his business name.)

Later, someone removed the "S" (probably an angry local.)

After that, he must've gotten all the lettering taken off.
 
drsleuth said:
I dare say if BS & MS's evidence in court tomorrow is in closed court there may well be a riot. :rolleyes:

I hope this week is run better than the last ( where we only heard evidence from 6 witnesses all week ) :mad:
Click to expand...

One would think that if Peter O'Brien wants to proclaim his client's innocence he would need to encourage the court to stay open. And for some solid proof of Spedding's non-involvement to be shown.

I seriously want to know about his phone's ping action and content (and why he deleted his call log right at that particular time!) so if that is considered 'police methodology', will they close the court again??
 
SouthAussie said:
One would think that if Peter O'Brien wants to proclaim his client's innocence he would need to encourage the court to stay open. And for some solid proof of Spedding's non-involvement to be shown.

I seriously want to know about his phone's ping action and content (and why he deleted his call log right at that particular time!) so if that is considered 'police methodology', will they close the court again??
Click to expand...
Me too. I'd also like to know if any of the teachers present at the assembly will be called to verify his attendance.
 
SouthAussie said:
One would think that if Peter O'Brien wants to proclaim his client's innocence he would need to encourage the court to stay open. And for some solid proof of Spedding's non-involvement to be shown.

I seriously want to know about his phone's ping action and content (and why he deleted his call log right at that particular time!) so if that is considered 'police methodology', will they close the court again??
Click to expand...

Mr O'Brien has argued for open court ( mostly ) all along probably because he's locked out as well ;)

As for phone pings, well if discussion around survillance , PI & LD's have been ? reasons for closed court than I dare say yes SA :mad:

One of the media tried to challenge this basically saying it's no secret that the police use these methods & that you only need to watch a hollywood movie to know that :D ..........no luck thou
 
drsleuth said:
Mr O'Brien has argued for open court ( mostly ) all along probably because he's locked out as well ;)

As for phone pings, well if discussion around survillance , PI & LD's have been ? reasons for closed court than I dare say yes SA :mad:

One of the media tried to challenge this basically saying it's no secret that the police use these methods & that you only need to watch a hollywood movie to know that :D ..........no luck thou
Click to expand...

Mr O'Brien will be allowed to stay if it is his client who is in closed court, won't he?

I wonder if he is supporting Spedding's wife, as well. Or if that might be seen as a conflict.
 
SouthAussie said:
Not sure what you mean, tgy. Contempt of court against who? Dean Pollard for wavering in his testimony? Ch7 for some reason?
Click to expand...

Dean Pollard for wasting time and resources.
It's a big difference of 100% sure on the day he saw the van to DOH not so sure now and then spiking a massive search.
I find this suspicious. He saw BS's van 100% HUH?
 
they'll get you said:
Dean Pollard for wasting time and resources.
It's a big difference of 100% sure on the day he saw the van to DOH not so sure now and then spiking a massive search.
I find this suspicious. He saw BS's van 100% HUH?
Click to expand...

Well, we learned something from Dean Pollard. Whoever was driving that van ducked their head down so they couldn't be identified.
Whether or not that becomes of any real significance later on .....
 
they'll get you said:
Dean Pollard for wasting time and resources.
It's a big difference of 100% sure on the day he saw the van to DOH not so sure now and then spiking a massive search.
I find this suspicious. He saw BS's van 100% HUH?
Click to expand...

I got the impression that the coroner & Mr Craddock were surprised by his evidence o_O IMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 117 more.
Total: 639 (members: 118, guests: 521)

Online statistics

Members online
118
Guests online
521
Total visitors
639
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,357
Messages
18,238,179
Members
234,353
Latest member
Oushavinge
Back
Top