SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,778
- Reaction score
- 181,441
It is hard to imagine that cover up charges would succeed in court, if they can't prove there was anything to cover up. If an accident is just a theory.
Does anyone know why the fm can’t be named? Originally I understood it was because she was a foster carer… as I understand she is no longer a foster carer? CutiousNSW Police has recommended the foster mother of William Tyrrell be charged with interfering with a corpse and perverting the course of justice.
Snip
A charge would likely initiate the start of a court proceeding, and a judge or jury would decide if there was enough evidence for a conviction.
Free article:
I guess if people do not have an air tight alibi for when WT went missing, then they are still in the frame. Unfortunately, FFC doesn't have one (that we know of) that anyone can back up. She was only metres from him when he disappeared and then disappeared herself so it seems from everyone's field of view and hearing for a period of time. So she was at the scene when he disappeared and has no corroborated alibi. If she has provided one and police are sitting on it, then I'm sure she will sue, but this investigation of her is run by the coroner isn't it, who has asked the public for information to be sent to her, so if the police had failed to hand on evidence to her that cleared the FFC, the FFC could always pass her evidence onto the coroner.
Does anyone know why the fm can’t be named? Originally I understood it was because she was a foster carer… as I understand she is no longer a foster carer? Cutious
This is a free link to an article …. As long as you haven’t read too many articles this month ….
![]()
Police allege William Tyrrell’s foster mum covered up death, seek charges
Detectives searching for the missing three-year-old, who would now be 12, have recommended prosecutors charge his foster mother over allegedly covering up his death.www.smh.com.au
(FM’s) lawyer, Sharon Ramsden, told the Herald she had not been advised that police had recommended charges. She will write to police on Wednesday seeking confirmation.
“We are saying we know what happened and why it happened and where [his body] is.”
The courts would hear the woman responded: “What? Why haven’t you got him?”
And also whether the grandmother must have been complicit in it. (Am I right in thinking she has since passed away?)
And the foster dad, possibly, he was out for a while when all this was going off iirc.
I am wondering if it might have been someone close to the fosters at the time… someone who was very young at the time when you block things out but when you get older, some memories resurface….Detectives have been investigating "allegations" there was a deadly accident at a home in Kendall
So someone has made the allegations to the detectives to investigate ..? Thats how it reads....
Anything is possible, but three people covering up an accident raises the odds so high? If you watch the FGM showing LE around the house and walking them through the morning, it's hard to believe she is sticking to some predetermined master plan. Maybe I have a blind spot on little old ladies.is it within the realms of possibility that all three witnessed a fatal accident and covered it up?
Cheers @JBowie, much appreciated… is it within the realms of possibility that all three witnessed a fatal accident and covered it up?
All recent revelations aside, I must say that I'm hugely relieved that he wasn't taken by one of the local pedo's
because the thought of what could have been is unthinkable.
My thoughts are that he has possibly fallen off the balcony where the FFM has found him deceased. She has then
made some very stupid, hasty decisions and that has lead to where proceedings are today.