TootsieFootsie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 13,814
- Reaction score
- 93,014
Awww what a fizzer...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then it's a DRAMATIC twist ... and so far it's a load of old news rehashed. IMO, the panel is underwhelming. This program confirms for me why I haven't bothered turning on the TV for years.
Well, that turned out to be your typical tabloid television. So much for cuts and bruises.
So 7 spotlight was a bust.
If it was me and years later I was still being accused, with no proof, I would most likely be acting rather aloof and maybe a bit careful and standoffish. I'd probably be feeling a bit angry and annoyed and fed up.So 7 spotlight was a bust. The only thing I took from it was how much real feeling you get from the bio mum's interview than you do from the FM imo
Will the case be solved?
Caroline “it has to be solved”
Charlie “in my experience no it won’t but you never lose hope”
Other journo whose name I forget “it will be solved but I think it will take a long time, I hope I see it my lifetime” Me too mate, me too.
Honestly IMO I feel it has been years of demonising the bio parents and it's only a recent turn on the Fosters.If it was me and years later I was still being accused, with no proof, I would most likely be acting rather aloof and maybe a bit careful and standoffish. I'd probably be feeling a bit angry and annoyed and fed up.
And not "like you would expect someone to act" So they say.
You know, kind of like Lindy Chamberlain
After years of demonising someone, how do you think they would act ?
Honestly IMO I feel it has been years of demonising the bio parents and it's only a recent turn on the Fosters.
And I'm not saying how someone should act, just theirs appears to be a lot more actual emotion coming from the bio mum IMO. Bio mum's one sentence of "please don't hurt him" or words to that effect, I can't remember exactly elicited actually tears from me. I can't say the same to anything that has ever left the foste7
The entire media framing has been around the faux grief of the foster mother JMO. The bio mother who displays real grief has not been given the same air time.So why was the bio mothers comments not shown to us until now?
I can maybe understand that back in 2015 they wanted to keep the focus away from FF if they were so certainly cleared.
Was it the police keeping it suppressed? Or journalistic judgement?
And what has triggered this late release? Could have released it years ago! Is it just deemed "safe" now??
Anyone watching that would think very differently about the bio Mum (to what the trash tabloids have been presenting, and were allowed to present).... why not let her have her emotional say sooner?
Was it because she came across as very genuine? While the FF interview conducted by police was by comparison less raw and done (by necessity, I guess?) in the shadows?
... claims of William having bruises, snotty noses and clothing inadequate for weather conditions.
So 7 spotlight was a bust. The only thing I took from it was how much real feeling you get from the bio mum's interview than you do from the FM imo
If it was me and years later I was still being accused, with no proof, I would most likely be acting rather aloof and maybe a bit careful and standoffish. I'd probably be feeling a bit angry and annoyed and fed up.
And not "like you would expect someone to act" So they say.
You know, kind of like Lindy Chamberlain
After years of demonising someone, how do you think they would act ?
AgreeI hadn’t seen that before and it made me cry. For all bio mum’s faults there’s no doubt in my mind that she loves her son.
It’s not her face that is the problem. Her emotions seem fake.I think it’s made more difficult for some to warm to FM and for some to even demonise her because you can’t see her face.
He was the only rational person on the panel JMO. CO was predictably vague and riding the plausible deniability line. The detective spouted untruths such as that jubelin had permission to unlawfully record suspects. I wonder why Michael usher wasn’t there. I could speculate, but it’s obvious without speculation.Mark Morri of the Daily Telegraph and he seems to specialize in interrupting others, especially CO.
Charlie stood up for Gary and says after all Gary’s done for Australia, his conviction doesn’t sit well with him.
Later, when Mark suggested that the current police must have something on FM to refer to DPP and it couldn’t be political, Charlie rolled his eyes and scoffed.
MOO - it seemed Charlie thought it was most likely a beat up, that police politics got in the way, Caroline undecided, Mark thought FM must be involved.
My perspective only, others may well disagree, which would be a surprise twist for WS.