<From Floh's link:
Reinhard Haller, one of Austrias leading forensic psychiatrists who prepares expert opinions on serious offenders for local courts, rejected the claims that Mr Frizl was mentally incompetent and therefore not responsible for his actions.
Dr Haller said: His main motivation was the exercise of power. It is not a sign of mental illness, but rather of an extreme personality disorder.">
HOORAY!!!!!:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
finally.... some common sense. as i said, you can be SICK,, and yet, not be 'insane'......
also,, from speigel:
<"He seems a bit afraid," says Günther Mörwald, prison governor at St. Pölten. The prisoner from Amstetten is not speaking much, but, according to Mörwald, he is slowly understanding "what he did to his family." The prison governor says he is seeing the "first signs of regret," from Fritzl.>
well HEY,, it's about freaking time!!! maybe he would have gotten a clue much earlier that his actions were wrong... if someone, ANYONE-- had put him in check.... his mother, his wife, his friends, neighbors, family members... and if not any of them, then- society, the LAW, etc.. but time after time after time he got away with and kept slipping through loopholes.
so this seems like a GOOD thing (the regret that is ever-so-slowly dawning on him).. and yet, bad for his defense... because in showing an understanding that what he did may have actually been wrong.... well, there goes his insanity defense.