white rabbit
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 3,078
- Reaction score
- 1,632
but that's just it baxter, no one's out looking. and it's infuriating.
i agree with your post...and i also agree with much of what oceanblueeyes is saying, with a large caveat. it was LE who called CPS in may. bolded/snipped by me:
http://www.azfamily.com/news/CPS-step-up-involvement-in-case-of-missing-Tucson-girl-151221085.html
Lt. Fabian Pacheco said during the course of the ongoing investigation, detectives felt the need to get CPS more involved.
"I know that it raises a lot of questions as well, but unfortunately due to the sensitive and delicate nature of the investigation, we are not able to share additional details of why we're at this point," Lt. Pacheco said.
ok so...last year or at some point in the past, LE has been called to the home. we don't know why but according to very public and easily accessed pima county/tucson sherriff websites, there were no charges filed against either parent.
in december, CPS was called to the home having nothing to do with SC or IC.
in may, LE called CPS. CPS separated SC "to ensure the welfare of the older siblings," Lt. Pacheco said."
if neither CPS call was because of SC, IC, or RC...who does that leave us with???
i agree with your post...and i also agree with much of what oceanblueeyes is saying, with a large caveat. it was LE who called CPS in may. bolded/snipped by me:
http://www.azfamily.com/news/CPS-step-up-involvement-in-case-of-missing-Tucson-girl-151221085.html
Lt. Fabian Pacheco said during the course of the ongoing investigation, detectives felt the need to get CPS more involved.
"I know that it raises a lot of questions as well, but unfortunately due to the sensitive and delicate nature of the investigation, we are not able to share additional details of why we're at this point," Lt. Pacheco said.
ok so...last year or at some point in the past, LE has been called to the home. we don't know why but according to very public and easily accessed pima county/tucson sherriff websites, there were no charges filed against either parent.
in december, CPS was called to the home having nothing to do with SC or IC.
in may, LE called CPS. CPS separated SC "to ensure the welfare of the older siblings," Lt. Pacheco said."
if neither CPS call was because of SC, IC, or RC...who does that leave us with???