Jaybee, I don't believe that is correct. When the car was towed in, in July, the officer who was with the car when it was towed in handed the CSI a black plastic bag with those items inside it. Something at the body dump site caused the detectives to go back Dec 16, to retrieve those items, probably in an attempt to match serration marks and pull up lot numbers and the black plastic bag batch.
No sure what you mean. What isn't correct? I have quoted directly from the forensics report. The items in the black plastic bag are listed on page 3174 of the County Forensics Report-Part 2:
Page 3174 of County Forensics Report-Part 2
"After the exterior of the vehile was photographed, Detective Beasley provided me with the following evidence:
Black plastic bag containing inside:
Doll (Art #3, Item # H-51975)
Backpack (Art #4, # H-51975)
Childs tooth brush (Art #5, # H-51975)
Black leather bag (Art #6, # H-51975)
Various papers (Art #7, # H-51975)
Dinner knife (Art #8, # H-51975)
Blue plastic crate (Art #9, # H-51975)
Plastic clothes hangers (Art #10, # H-51975)"
Page 3214 of County Forensics Report-Part 2
Article #1 of this Identification No. (H-51975) was in a separate sealed box:
"Article #1, Item H-51975 (Sealed Box)
* Black plastic bag with yellow pull handles
* Pull-ups "with flowers design" collected from back pack "Adorable"
* Stainless Steel knife"
There were 10 items (Articles) with Identification #H-51975 (first page of County Forensics Report-part 2; articles #1 and #8 both list a knife. On page 3174 the black plastic bag is not tagged as evidence, but on page 3214 a black plastic bag is tagged as evidence (Article #1). It sounds odd to me. Perhaps someone took the pull-ups from the backpack and placed them along with the knife and black plastic bag into a box and sealed it with the same identification number. By doing so, the black plastic bag becomes evidence. I don't know......I'm totally confused!