missy1974
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 10,142
- Reaction score
- 31,356
This is the skull I thought? the circular mark at the top is the bullet wound
ohhh it could be!
but there was still more than 1 found in the quarry lol
This is the skull I thought? the circular mark at the top is the bullet wound
ohhh it could be!
but there was still more than 1 found in the quarry lol
I thought they had already removed a bunch of ashes/debris by the time they took the pictures. In the arson investigator testimony he talks about the area already being "dug" up before he got there.
I have to go to bed (pffft work LOL) but find the arson investigator testimony, try to figure out what he is talking about with the pics open ;-)
Well the testimony about gathering the bones says it took all day and into the evening/dark. Said they even set up lights because they wanted all the collection done then. It's really too bad the photos aren't time stamped so we know when exactly and at what point they were taken.
What bones were found in the quarry? I thought I read it was her pelvis. Is that true?
Then to me that says the pelvic bone was moved there from the original burn site. Maybe the hope was that it would not be found. Most of the bones were found in the burn pit, where there just so happened to be a bonfire the very day TH went missing, mere hours after TH arrived there. SA was home, around his property, and nearby all day and evening. Coinky-dink?
I have no insight into why SA did or didn't do what people wonder about. Kidnapping and killing a person makes no sense, so expecting them to operate in the way someone else would might be futile.
The problem I have with the cremains is the fact that they're not only in the pit but in the quarry as well.
Even if SA killed TA and burned her remains at the quarry, there is no reason on earth he would then move them to the burn pit. And if he burned them in the burn pit, why oh why would he take a couple of fragments and dump them in the quarry? Makes no sense whatsoever.
For this reason, I do think her cremains were planted in the pit. That is, that her remains were burned in the quarry, and then moved to the burn pit. And, whoever moved them, missed the fragments that were later found in the investigation.
If anything, this strongly indicates SA was, in fact, framed for Ms. Halbach's murder. Though it does not indicate who, precisely, moved her cremains.
With regard to the "whodunnit and how," I may post something in the alternate theories thread at some later point. No promises!
That is the part that doesn't make sense. Fine... he burns her in the pit.... goes through the burned remains, picks out some to take to the burn barrel, and then some to the quarry??? This is the same guy that the prosecution claims was sooooo smart to clean up DNA in the garage/trailer/SUV, yet he picks through the bones to move a few here and few there.
The part that nags at me is... Blaine in his very first statement said that he was burning garbage in the barrels, thought it might have been November 3rd, the Thursday, the same day TH was reported missing. If this is true.... the bones in that burn barrel would have to be put in there after November 3rd, by SA or whoever, because the anthropologist testified that all the bones (from all 3 locations) had the same burning/charring consistency (which means to me they were burned at the same time and were moved, whether you believe he moved a few out of the burn pit, or someone moved the majority to the burn pit). If the bones were there when he was burning garbage on November 3rd, I would think that they would have been burned further, or destroyed further (not sure of the right wording LOL) What I didn't find in the testimony was.... were those bones in the barrel at the bottom? the top? were they mixed in? that is pretty important information, and I think that is why an expert should have been on scene IMO