Why the hell not incinerate THAT?! lol
`maybe the documents contained instructions on how to operate it and he had them with him for that reason..my guess they were not in his yukon since 2012.
Why the hell not incinerate THAT?! lol
Guessing he needed it for Millardair accounting purposes, but needed the cops to not find out about it.
Why the hell not incinerate THAT?! lol
*What item(s) flew out? We only have evidence of one cardboard box flying out of trial during transportation.
*How so...contamination? There was a seal placed on the rear door before it was towed from MB's driveway. Where did you read there was no guard stationed in the garage to guard the trailer? IMO I do not believe this is common LE practice for a secure garage with no doubt would have locks on the entry doors and perhaps outside/inside surveillance.
*The officer who entered the trailer in MB's driveway suited up in white overalls IIRC. I will try and find that tweet.
*There is documentation. From the retired forensics tech, who now lives in Florida. McLellan has his report in front of her. And McLellan's 666 photographs. Also there may be other techs who made documentation who may testify yet. IMO none of this makes LE look careless. HTH and MOO.
Susan Clairmont ‏@susanclairmont 4h
Dungey demanding to know why she didn't photograph/video entire exam process. "I could have, but I didn't," she says. Not police practice.
Susan Clairmont ‏@susanclairmont 4h4 hours ago
McLellan explaining cramped quarters made video difficult. "We chose not to do it." She does not seem flustered by Dungey
molly hayes ‏@mollyhayes 4h4 hours ago
He asks while the whole examination was not videotaped. She says I guess we could've but we didn't. We don't do that in practice.
That is not actually an accurate picture of the model he purchased. Not sure if we can find a link with the correct one.
I guess it would depend who actually ordered it and why jmo
I doubt Shane had the authority to order a $15,000+ incinerator out of the MillardAir purse on his own signature without the boss knowing what it was for.
Why would he be carrying a document like the incinerator purchase in his car?
Why would he be carrying a document like the incinerator purchase in his car?
Why the hell not incinerate THAT?! lol
"won't testify" = refuses to testify
"won't testify" = won't be testifying cause somebody else who was there with him has his nice detailed notes.
Take your pick and keep playing devil's advocate. It's all in how you interpret the wording, and how the words are rearranged in the tweets.
I agree w/you. I'm not sure how to double quote so as to also include original poster, but this is my add on to your thoughts to them.
It is a gross misrepresentation to SAY that a police officer would
a) "refuse" to testify -- they certainly know it is a natural extension of their work, and are expected to do this with frequency. And
b) this fails to account for the fact that they would be compelled by the prosecution if it were deemed necessary.
I find this characterization really offensive--not only misleading, but an insult to LE. My understanding is this is supposed to be a LE supportive forum. There's a lot of things being stated here that are IMO really slanderous.
We're in Canada eh. Could probably leave all that stuff in an unlocked car with the windows down all day long and no one would touch it.
I trust SS will take the stand to explain all about the need for ordering the incinerator. I wonder if his testimony will factor into the DI in Laura's case.