brightii
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,141
- Reaction score
- 26
I'm wondering if part of DM's defence strategy is to sic NS on him for days on end to exhaust him and confuse him to the point where MS will begin to show true contempt for DM via NS (more than MS already has). Then once NS has convinced MS that NS is just a lame lawyer unable to make his point, NS will pounce! NS will then use MS's dreadfully poor memory for important events against him. NS will say MS's demonstrated poor recall abilities (that MS has worked so hard to convince the jury are genuine) are real and must be caused by experiencing extreme trauma while in a drug and alcohol induced stupor or suffered some bad drug/alcohol interaction that caused MS to reach for his gun that of course DM had no idea he was carrying and then MS shockingly shot TB! NS will suggest convincingly that MS did kill TB, but because MS was so traumatized in the moment and after the fact that MS went into a state of shock and denial and now has no memory of what happened.
So MS's loyal big brother DM felt he had no choice but to help his troubled and impulsive and reckless little brother MS get out of the terribly tragic mess MS had made! Then of course DM scrambled to help MS by incinerating TB's body and hiding the truck inside the trailer at his mother's home and destroying evidence that could incriminate MS! DM was taking care of MS in the days after by giving him weed and visiting him to ensure he was ok. Who knows? If the jury believed such a tale, DM could be transformed from being seen as a maniacal menace to the misguided protector of MS for affording MS so much compassion and for risking his own freedom to help his best friend. Maybe NS would then point to how DM was trying to get psychotic drug and alcohol addicted MS professional help and DM regretted that he didn't succeed in getting MS help sooner.
Just a wild speculative defence strategy for DM, but I think my fiction would be more believable than what DM's defence has offered up so far, IMO.
All MOO.
So MS's loyal big brother DM felt he had no choice but to help his troubled and impulsive and reckless little brother MS get out of the terribly tragic mess MS had made! Then of course DM scrambled to help MS by incinerating TB's body and hiding the truck inside the trailer at his mother's home and destroying evidence that could incriminate MS! DM was taking care of MS in the days after by giving him weed and visiting him to ensure he was ok. Who knows? If the jury believed such a tale, DM could be transformed from being seen as a maniacal menace to the misguided protector of MS for affording MS so much compassion and for risking his own freedom to help his best friend. Maybe NS would then point to how DM was trying to get psychotic drug and alcohol addicted MS professional help and DM regretted that he didn't succeed in getting MS help sooner.
Just a wild speculative defence strategy for DM, but I think my fiction would be more believable than what DM's defence has offered up so far, IMO.
All MOO.