That is exactly my point. If we have doubts about how and when she heard about DM's arrest, it puts her whole testimony at risk, IMO. I am satisfied that videos, texts, and other evidence put both of them at the scene of the crime, and it also shows planning an all nighter mission. MM's testimony of their mood when they picked her up is very revealing ....... if those pieces like how she heard of the arrest around 9:00 p.m. on the 10th can be verified. I do realize that MM's testimony is really about MS, but so far there is substantial missing evidence of his intentions or knowledge of the murder. CN's testimony, I would assume will be the exact opposite, mostly about DM.
We all know they were both there. But was this a planned theft and murder? I am 99.9% sure it was, and would just like verify loose ends that should be able to be verified.
Is there evidence someone contacted MS when he panicked and called AM that "they got Dell"?
or
Is there evidence that DM's arrest was on the news as early as she claims?
My questions are based on what we know, not what we are going to know by the end of CN's testimony. It may be important, and it may not.
I don't understand how you can say you believe MB or CN contacted MS without a shred of evidence? I'm just asking if we can prove something we heard by a witness, a star witness.
MOO