I just love how polite you are:hug: I really do!
Thank you:blushing:
You know, as I was typing the 18 year thing I thought, " I better put in 12 or SOMEONE is going to call me out on it " lol..I was just to lazy to fix it. OOPS.
No worries. No one is as lazy as me
As far as LE, do you really believe LE anywhere aren't capable of planting evidence or framing someone to secure charges? It happens, often.
I agree that it could happen and I agree that LE have the capability to do so. However, I place my trust in their ability to do the right thing, most of the time. If they did something hooky this time, they actually did a poor job, it could have been more convincing.
36 million IS motive. That money wasn't covered. Not even half. Not to mention the effects of losing millions would trickle down through the
city.( budget cuts, funding for programs,etc. ) I don't think EVERY officer was in on the frame job. I think some may have " looked the other way "
Lenk & Colborn were not accused of anything. The law suit was not going to nail them for anything. Incompetence perhaps, but the detail around the new DNA being discovered is not clear. MAM has an advantage here because of the lack of clarity on the process.
You REALLY think each and every piece of evidence in this case was just LENK & COLBORN, getting EXTREMELY LUCKY, after LOTSA searching? ( MULTIPLE searches in some instances ) C'mon now? lol The TWO men who weren't even supposed to BE THERE HELPING TO BEGIN WITH?? WHO WERE ABOUT TO BE INTERVIEWED AGAIN BECAUSE OF AVERY? ( Deposition )
I think that we are looking at this with two abilities. The benefit of hindsight and the knowledge that processes & techniques are now far better. (Actually, I have read those sentiences back and they are not very good, but I guess you know what I mean.
)
And I notice you refer to the documentary, A LOT. I agree 100% TONS was left out of the documentary. What most folks fail to remember is the documentary wasn't meant to PROVE SA or BD guilty or ( gasp ) innocent. These were two filmmakers who made a documentary about the " system " These ladies also gave BOTH sides a chance to TALK and the STATE REFUSED.
The State did refuse. I agree. But then, they would, wouldn't they? Where is the need to challenge their own narrative? I think lot's is made out of this apparent 'Omission' from the series. It is poorly made in my opinion and the claim the State refused to participate, is a good example of the bias in the show.
Instead of referencing the MAM documentary, we could reference the actual reports, evidence,photos, or lack there of. Not directing it to YOU personally, at all. ( I honestly mean that )
Just thinking, MAM did it's job. It made people talk and take a good hard look at our system. Me personally, I never realized how many innocent men are in prison. I never knew how hard one had to fight to get out, even after innocence was proven.
Never knew how OFTEN coercion or false confessions happen.
I totally agree that coercion takes place. I live in the UK and our Justice system is just as flawed as the one in the US. MAM did its job is a telling comment my friend. It's design was to provoke and it worked.
And I tell ya what, I think now more than ever about what an UNBIASED JURY really means, how IMPORTANT it MUST be to have one. Totally agree. Some Juries should not be allowed to judge Britains Got Talent!
FWIW, I HAVE let my mind go to " what if they DID do this " in multiple scenarios. I made myself. I kept coming back with too many unanswered questionable QUESTIONS..lol..
SO much does not add up. One can say " it's the last place she was seen alive "
Is it?? Can you PROVE it?? HOW? PROVE to me that Teresa Halbach was last seen alive at Steven Averys property. PROVE she did NOT drive OFF that property.
No one can prove anything. But we have to run with the knowledge we have. Unfortunately, that knowledge is not good for anyone living on Avery's Salvage Yard.
If Zellner has Cell info that shows she indeed did, leave Averys, then what?
I am disgusted by the way Zellner has conducted her campaign. If this evidence she says she had (back in February by the way) is true, Avery would be out now. I fear she is cashing in. I stand to be corrected and will return to this forum if proved wrong to apologise, but in my opinion, there is no new evidence and Avery will remain behind bars.
If we look at the real reason the fraudulent documentary ( as one sleuther called it ) was made, I do believe it just may have served it's purpose
Totally agree. Here are two strangers discussing it. Rationally
I apologize for the rambling, typos and screwy ( lack of ) grammar and this being all over the place. It's 415am and I am suffering from a severe case of WHAT THE HECK AM I STILL DOING AWAKEITIS