When did MJ "find" the sneaker, panties and semen tissue??
Could Gagnon have planted it while LE were questioning and watching MJ and AR???
Those items were found on the 26th - http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66962
When did MJ "find" the sneaker, panties and semen tissue??
Could Gagnon have planted it while LE were questioning and watching MJ and AR???
i believe that was found on the 26 th leading everyone the wrong way.When did MJ "find" the sneaker, panties and semen tissue??
Could Gagnon have planted it while LE were questioning and watching MJ and AR???
the 26th
Jesus, can this case get any stranger?
So that would mean on the 25th, in Texas, he accesses her account, the phone calls between he and Jacques were the night/early morning of the 25/26...some time he then get in a car and drives to Alabama, where the next day, 26th he again attempts to access her account??????????????????????? WTF.
okay..so that rules out Gagnon planting Brooke's things and the semen.
I'm not sure RG would touch Brooke's dead body to bury her. If he didn't take part in killing her, why would he risk tying himself to a murder by doing something like that?
Welcome! There were other references to trips as well. Hmmmmmmm!Another newbie here........ trying to keep up with the new info. I have been reading since the beginning and remember that someone posted about a missing 12yo girl from the Cullman area from December 2007. Now that it is obvious that RG remained connected to that area and traveled there, I am very suspicious about that young girl's disappearance. Especially since MJ traveled to Texas. That makes it obvious that they both could easily have gone to Alabama at the same time. Perhaps when MJ (pretending to be Rauel) was "traveling in Africa" which by the way is a creepy reference to Brooke's MySpace listing of Cullman, EGYPT.
Well, it makes more sense than what that dummy did...planting evidence in a baggie. Pleeeeez!It sounds like they are still waiting on COD and whether any forensics exist to tie Jacques or anyone else to Brooke's murder.
So far Jacques is still not charged with Brooke's murder, only her kidnapping. So, I would say that means they don't have enough evidence for that yet, either physical evidence or more admissions from AR or Gagnon.
I think if they had evidence that Gagnon burried Brooke, they would charge him. But, now it seems at least very possible that he DID destroy actual evidence while he was in Vermont and not under any suspicion that we know of when he got there.
As I think someone else said, Jacques could have planted the clothes to ensure LE was looking in that area to free up Gagnon to destroy the real crime scene/evidence.
my understanding is it wasnt in the baggy, but the baggy got left behind, complete screw up there.Well, it makes more sense than what that dummy did...planting evidence in a baggie. Pleeeeez!
try kayak.comjnodrog, Where would RG fly to in Vt- Burlington? If he rented a car at that airport, how long would it take to get to Brooke's mom's house (or MJ"s)?
I may go online here and see costs of next day tix for San antonio to B'ham, then B'ham to ? VT- also looking for schedules. Should I go on travelocity or somewhere else?
Well, it makes more sense than what that dummy did...planting evidence in a baggie. Pleeeeez!
about a little more than an hour he would be in randolph from burlington.jnodrog, Where would RG fly to in Vt- Burlington? If he rented a car at that airport, how long would it take to get to Brooke's mom's house (or MJ"s)?
I may go online here and see costs of next day tix for San antonio to B'ham, then B'ham to ? VT- also looking for schedules. Should I go on travelocity or somewhere else?
I agree. I think something went way wrong...Brooke died and they had to backpedal fast. But then...when I read the emails it sounds like he plans on killing her from the get go.[/QUOTE]
I think it's pretty clear his intention was for Brooke never to come back home or be found alive, or else she'd be able to contradict all of his lies and fake evidence (semen) that he concocted for over a month.
Thanks...I never read about the baggie in an article...just here on the board...who would do something so stupid...nevermind....that question answers itself.my understanding is it wasnt in the baggy, but the baggy got left behind, complete screw up there.
Allen
Well, it makes more sense than what that dummy did...planting evidence in a baggie. Pleeeeez!