Yes, but I believe many are interested in anyone else witnessing this,other then just ml's version of that evening.
Even though I'm on the fence, I think you should stay right where you are. Listen to your gut. I need help deciding which side to hop of into.
On the flip side, wouldn't it have been in his best interest to say things like, she was depressed, upset, about something so that he could have people think she might have driven to the levy to hurt herself? Yet he painted her as positive, happy etc. Ugh. I dunno. I dunno.
It's foul play simply where the phone was found IMO. This made me sick and I feel for the family but especially her father. I can only imagine how he feels. All of her family and friends seem stunned that she was in Yuba City and had no clue who ML was. Family I could understand but her friends would have an idea I would think. ML Said she was chugging wine? Um I could be wrong but in the news interview didn't he say it was low key and they sipping wine? He states she was in party mode? Strange. Not sure how to take the LE and his words in the video. I'd like to think they know a lot more than that are leading on...watching the second video LE seems to hesitate when asked about ML and his involvement. If you read between the lines to me it sounds like he says we don't have evidence but he is our main POI. But that is simply my thoughts in his hesitation, body language, and how he responded. Very interesting how he even stated "it's as if the phone was placed here for us to find". For the fathers sake I hope LE doesn't drop the ball on this one.
.I'll take the bait...I would know these things and I love wine and not a day in my life have I chugged wine...not even in my mindless college days. That stuck out to me big time. Wine has a high alcohol content too v. Beer and such.Chugging isn't usually used with wine I would think, I can see chugging beer but wine is hard to chug imo
Not that I would know these things
Both but more so were it was found. From my classes I've learned pings can be touchy and not always accurate. So in this case yes that is the first clue that something is off. But as an investigator...you question something that is found in plain sight...ESPECIALLY when LE was at the location previously because of the truck. The LE fellow in the video seemed to imply that by stating the "it's as of someone wanted us to find it" because it would have easily been found before when they were there. Everything since far points to foul play. I feel ML holds the key(s) to this case. Either direct involvement or protecting someone...his contradictions speak volumes...can keep blaming it on nerves.
