What's really interesting, imo, is if we break this down and look at it in it's simplest form, the co-conservators are supposed to be caring for Bob's assets as if he were STILL HERE. (I don't think anyone can dispute that is not what has occured - simply based on the harassment of Mrs. Harrod and the BL in court, all the wasted assets and emptying Bob's home.)
IF Bob were here, and legally his assets are supposed to be protected as if he WERE here, it would not be unusual for a retiree with his assets to travel for 3 months of the year, spend time at a second home for 3 months of the year, or visit family who live out of state for 3 months out of the year.
If we were to look at ALL the retires with assets similiar to Bob's, I'd think it would be the norm, rather than the anomaly Bob's daughters are trying make out of occupying the main marital residence 9 out of 12 months a year.
There is a perfectly clear picture of what is going on here, regardless of which way they try to cover it up by calling it an obligaton or attempting to point fingers at others.
And we have only seen a little in comparison to what LE see's.