[/B]
BBM...
Oh... I hate it when "know-it-alls" really DO know it all...
:giggle:
Did he provide you with the complete spin on what he thinks happened? If so care to share or would it be against the rules what his thoughts are?
[/B]
BBM...
Oh... I hate it when "know-it-alls" really DO know it all...
:giggle:
OK. More spinning by IM. In that first video interview she said Cassy couldn't be moved to Base but I don't recall her saying Erin was giving her up. She said after 30 days of no contact then the horse was considered abandoned and would be put up for adoption.
Spin your tales some more, IM.
In this second video - IM says the Lees came there for a year and a half and that is how Erin found her. So, clearly. either Erin asked around about horses and someone directed her to the Lees, or she heard them discussing horses and gravitated to them. And then the carpooled with them. More than acquaintances I would say.
Exactly! I remember her saying that none of EC's family had been out to see the horse, and she was wondering if they would release the horse so she could find another place for it. So, in one interview she says EC relinquished the horse and in another, she's waiting for EC's family to do it.
For those of us who know nothing about horses (Los Angeles city girl here). What's the deal about boarding at the base rather than at the ranch? Why would Erin have had to move her horse to the base that was going to be closed down in a year? Couldn't she have continued to board her horse at the rescue ranch? I know nothing about adopting vs sponsoring a horse or relinquishing her ownership of the horse or shots or anything like that, just wondering why she would have to give up her horse because she wouldn't have a place to board it on the MCB.
I played IM first interview and she said EC stated in May she couldn't keep horse. IM went on to say that Cassie was available to EC for 30 days or abandonment/rehomed. In recent interview she mentioned none of EC's family have inquired about the horse.
I really feel IM is just not good at expressing herself. In new interview I think NL downplayed what happened at apartment to IM. LE was not doing voluntary/optional apt. next door search and then theirs looking for EC, they came armed with a warrant.
As far as CL suppose to meet up with friends, I think she was repeating what she was told by NC. With body not found comment I'm doing a bit of speculation that while being interviewed she compared real life LE work to TV and that's how they started to discuss CSI, ect.
IM knew the Lees a lot longer than she knew EC. She liked them enough to have them stay on ranch for a bit. She might not be able to say negative about them since she never experienced any reason to not to trust them. I believe we got some insight to what CL's story is, just wonder if his friends can back him up.
'Nuff babbling for the moment
Sounds like the horse is an easy distraction to deflect the conversation. It's just my opinion but I bet IM knows as well as anyone else does if Erin will coming to claim her horse. I highly doubt the horse is on the radar for any of Erin's family at this point. MOO
Question: How could she carpool with them when IM said the "family" rode during the week and EC rode on weekends?
ETA: I see other folks are wondering the same thing. I just need to play catch-up and quit posting until I do!
BBM From the scuttlebutt that we've heard her family has returned home so unless JC wanted to take on the task who would be left? Like you I seriously doubt a horse is at the top of their priority list at the moment. In fact, I'm sure it's the least of their concerns.
I had wondered if Erin agreed with JC to stop going to the rescue after being caught in the affair.
I think I know exactly what you're thinking and I agree with you. Maybe CL and IM had a "special" relationship and she feels like she needs to back him up. But... if they aren't speaking to her anymore you'd think she would be angry and do the opposite. Okay, I'm back on the fence.
Regarding the horse rescue -- this is a rescue, not a boarding stable, right? If it was a boarding stable, it would not be a non-profit. My understanding generally about a horse rescue is that people can "sponsor" a particular horse, i.e., pay for all or most of its food, vet needs and so forth, and they can also come to the location and ride that horse to exercise it or whatnot. But that horse does not belong to a person unless he or she actually adopts it under whatever terms the rescue center has. If a person adopts a horse, then the horse is taken elsewhere to be kept (boarded, or whatever the new owner plans). If someone is sponsoring a particular horse and actually comes to the location and cares for the horse at times, rides it, etc., then the owner of the rescue would likely refer to the horse as "so-and-so's horse", but that doesn't mean the sponsor actually owns the horse.
If the above is true, then it is likely that the horses that were CL's and NL's at the rescue were not horses that belonged to them actually.
Also, although the rescue probably would allow someone who actually adopted a horse to keep it there until other arrangements could be made, I doubt the horse could be boarded indefinitely at the rescue. A rescue needs to adopt out what animals it can in order to make room for more rescued ones.
Just my thoughts ....
Why did IM have CL potato gun in her car?
Was she attempting to hide it from LE?
Why wouldn't CL have his potato gun in his vehicle?
I don't get this. Maybe the perks of the "special" relationship? :facepalm:
I've been wondering if the Lee's were planning to move back to Alaska when they did or if their move got hastened in light of the situation. I can't understand why they would move to the ranch just to repack and move to Alaska. I feel like they intended to live at the ranch for a while but things quickly changed and they wanted to get as far from Cali as possible.
Um.......just an observation here:
Scott Peterson was convicted in 2004, and we have some 20 something year olds talking about THAT case? My son is 27 and he wouldn't have a clue, he was a teenager and didn't have the least interest in that stuff back then.
Maybe the horse rescue gal, IM, would have some knowledge of it, but the rest of the "players".........they would have been pre-teens, 10, 11, 13, and 14 at the time of Peterson's conviction, NOT the actual disappearance, which would have made them 2 years younger.
I'm not going to give this "story" from IM any credence, sounds like she's just making it up as she goes.
Well.... they do play the Lacy Peterson's story on Lifetime all the time. I just watched it a few weeks ago.
Even though I'm not a Dean Cain fan- he plays Scott pretty well.