That article doesn't say no alcohol, like op claimed.Look at the post I quoted or the same article here.
Not exactly sure where @LooksSusToMe saw the No alcohol part
Kiely Rodni's Death Ruled Accidental Drowning, No Signs of Foul Play
The investigation into the death of 16-year-old Kiely Rodni has wrapped, with results concluding she accidentally drowned in her vehicle after it was driven into a lake.www.tmz.com
That's not what that means. Ethanol is alcohol. So they're saying that they found alcohol in her system. It's just that since her body had begun decomposing and decomposition can produce ethanol naturally they can't conclusively say whether that alcohol was a result of drinking or decomposition or both.Look at the post I quoted or the same article here.
Kiely Rodni's Death Ruled Accidental Drowning, No Signs of Foul Play
The investigation into the death of 16-year-old Kiely Rodni has wrapped, with results concluding she accidentally drowned in her vehicle after it was driven into a lake.www.tmz.com
BBM and made larger for clarity.My most interesting take away from that article was:
“ The final investigation report states Kiely's body was located in the rear passenger section of her Honda.”
given the amount of discussion here about where poor Kiely was located.
Exactly, here's a study:That's not what that means. Ethanol is alcohol. So they're saying that they found alcohol in her system. It's just that since her body had begun decomposing and decomposition can produce ethanol naturally they can't conclusively say whether that alcohol was a result of drinking or decomposition or both.
BBMThat article doesn't say what you say it says:
As for the toxicology results, Rodni had both THC and ethanol in her system -- though the ethanol could have been a process of decomposition.
When bodies decompose, ethanol is occasionally detected during toxicology.
Apparently testing couldn't determine if this was related to drinking, or just part of the decomposition process.
It absolutely does not mean she wasn't intoxicated.
BBM and made larger for clarity.
It's been established that Kiely was found in the cargo area, NOT passenger area.
Questions now,
Why did they not wait until 11/1 like they said they were going to?
Why the sudden release? Why no statement on tox?
What made them change their "plan" for 11/1?
When AWP found Kiely, they had to blur out the rear side window in cargo area so people would not see her body.Can you remind me who exactly established that? And when? Thanks
Respectfully, WHO established that she was found in the cargo area? <modsnip; snarky>BBM and made larger for clarity.
It's been established that Kiely was found in the cargo area, NOT passenger area.
When AWP found Kiely, they had to blur out the rear side window in cargo area so people would not see her body.
RSBMWould it not be theoretically possibly for a body to be in the (upside down) rear passenger area, yet for *something*, e.g. a hand, long hair, to be visible through the rear cargo window?
BBM
As has been posted before in this thread and in #9, CA state law requires that information be public record
Tbh, those of us who watched the discovery video, saw with our own eyes that her body was in the cargo area. Were the passenger seats down? Maybe. Did her body float from the cargo area into the rear passenger area when the vehicle was uprighted & removed? Maybe.
Just because AWP's implication that Kiely and/or her vehicle were seen the day after the party doesn't appear to have been what happened (I've never seen AWP state it as a certainty -- but I could have missed it?), it certainly doesn't negate what we saw when her vehicle and body were discovered. We can't throw out the baby with the bath water.
Ultimately, it really doesn't matter. The final investigation report says what it says...and Kiely is still gone.
I agree!IMO, non of this noise matters. It’s done. Her story is over. Let her Rest In Peace!