Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 8,812
- Reaction score
- 59,118
I have a question. If NL was involuntary committed, it should have been on her record. Also, I don’t know how extended psychiatric care is called in TX, but I wonder if NL was released on some form of it after her commitment? These forms stipulate seeing a psychiatrist and taking medications after release from involuntary commitment. In TX this care lasts for a year after involuntary commitment, according to Google (if such form was used when NL was released). Not to doubt what was told by the lawyer/family, because they may not know everything, but could NL have merely stopped treatment after her extended psychiatric care expired?
So…hers was a huge accident, too huge, but NL seems to have been not herself at that time. The question is, with her mental condition, we can’t talk about punishment, because she is an ill human being. (Maybe she likes drinking or drugs, but we have no evidence of it; she was clean during the accident). But she represents an enormous danger on the streets. How do we severely curtail this danger, without violating the rights of a mentally ill person, the same rights for which so many generations of humanists have fought? It becomes an ethical question.
So…hers was a huge accident, too huge, but NL seems to have been not herself at that time. The question is, with her mental condition, we can’t talk about punishment, because she is an ill human being. (Maybe she likes drinking or drugs, but we have no evidence of it; she was clean during the accident). But she represents an enormous danger on the streets. How do we severely curtail this danger, without violating the rights of a mentally ill person, the same rights for which so many generations of humanists have fought? It becomes an ethical question.