Gee Scott Peterson "conduct" was suspect also. You know the "innocent conduct" of dying of his hair, the money, passport, camping gear, no evidence that he killed Lacy, all circumstantial. He was convicted.
Reiser does not care for children. He sees them as mere objects and possessions. If he did care about the kids, he would not have put them through the "horrors" of a custody battle. He would have been concerned that the mother of his children "was missing".
Reiser is a control freak. He wants everything, including the trial to be on his terms. Funny that all of "Reisers" problems including the Divorce and custody battle and his lack of paying child support ended with "Nina" going missing.
No trial for contempt for not paying child support, no dealings with the court system, no custody hearings, no support payments for his wife. His life is much better without her in the picture.
Funny how the last person to see Nina was the "ex husband who wanted to control her, the kids, the courts, the lawyers, etc.
How she was afraid of him. How he thought that "his Mother" would get custody of the kids.
He even thought his son did not need an ear operation. That Nina was "mentally" ill, that she was making up the story of her son needing an operation which Hans "wanted to stop".
Funny how he lost more access to the children as time went by.
Hans had plenty of time to "bury" Nina because in the days after her "going" missing he was quite the person who traveled.
You see, everything was in favor of Nina. Hans could not manipulate the justice system or courts. His wife was moving on without him, starting a career, planning for her future.
She visits the husband to drop off the kids and "suddenly" goes missing.
Gee how many women "go missing" from abusive ex husbands, who "ran off with another man, or who abandoned the kids, or just left etc.
No evidence of course to support the "story" except that the common theme is that the "wife and husband were in the middle of a nasty custody battle" or the wife wanted a divorce.
Hans deserves to "go down" for this crime.
Never did find the seat to the car...........
Hans thought that he could outsmart the Police, but in the end, he could not.
Now if anyone has any proof that Nina is alive, Nina defrauded the company and stole money, that Nina was a bad mom, that Nina would "abandon" her kids so they "end up with a man who could not obtain custody while she was alive, that she is working somewhere else, please share.
A women does not nor could not "disappear" without her passport, she could not obtain employment as a trained doctor without her medical degree. I mean the day she "went to visit" Hans, she "went missing off the face of the earth". Her car was found a short distance away from Reisers Mom's house.
In my opinion, the "geek" defense is just a ploy. Reiser is smart, no doubt about that, but he thought that "he would outsmart" the cops and justice system. But he is not that smart............
He just felt that his wife was "beneath" him, how she got the upper hand in the justice system, with the kids.
That pissed him off to no end. Funny how even with Nina "missing", he still did not "supervise" the kids, nor obtain custody of the kids.
You see winning at all costs is the "Hans" method, when he could not "win" against Nina, he ensured that he would not have to "battle" so he could never, ever lose again and get what he wanted without her to oppose him.
Smart people do dumb things. Looks and a person's character can be deceitful, not true to their "true" nature. Scott Peterson was the "golden" child, all American boy and look what he did to his wife and son.
Hans hated Nina. Nina goes missing. Hans goes to Prison where I guess he can "be a geek" in prison, I am sure that will go over well with the other convicts.
Some men just think that instead of a Divorce and custody battle, that killing the "source" of those battles is the easiest thing for them.
How many times have we heard this again and again, year after year.
I guess the police look at the motive when a wife and mother goes missing, who benefits and why. The only suspect who fits this is Hans.
If Hans cared so much for his kids I wonder why he refused to pay child support to Nina for the care of those kids.
Hans wanted a maid, a free employee, a housekeeper, a cook and a person to raise kids. He wanted a Stepford wife. When Nina refused to play his "part" he lost control of her. He regained control by killing her. All of his problems were solved.
