Her ex said it was a high school classmate, not that it happened during HS.
He also said they didn't know who did it, so how would they know it was a high school classmate if she wasn't even in HS anymore?
Her ex said it was a high school classmate, not that it happened during HS.
I believe the perps own SP's mind and the truth will not come out for fear of reprisal. I don't think we will ever learn what really happened in this case.
Sorry. I went and edited my post for clarity.I wasn't really responding to you...just adding my thought. I got the impression that the sheriff was NOT denying she wrote it. I assumed that by now they would know from Sherri herself. And I agree, about relevance and motive. I'm not trying to discuss what was written....there's no reason to do so. Sorry if it came across that way. I probably should have kept my mouth shut. [emoji850]
What leads you to believe LE has not done much investigation. On multiple occasions, the sheriff has described extensive efforts on the part of his team, including working through the holiday weekend and dedicating all available resources to this one case.Keeping it this vague may mean LE has not felt the need to do much investigation.
Q about the statement from KP
Didn't hear it all but Sheriff only received notification about an hour prior to it being aired and yes some details may have compromised the investigation
How do you see someone's eyebrows if you can't see them?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Really???Before they let her go, I am certain they threatened her repeatedly, saying they would come after her and her family, if she ever told who and where and what. I don't blame her one bit for making up a story, if this is what happened.
They are just keeping it way too vague to the point where I think they are either placating Sherri or they are placating the person they think actually did it. Let me put it this way: I am not at all under the impression that LE is asking the public's help to find these women. They were not sharing the latest "descriptions" as a way to get the public's input here. It seemed to me that they were giving out more of description to make these women look a little more real.
No, no! Miscommunication everywhere. The second part of my comment wasn't aimed at you either. I didn't think you were discussing the content. [emoji5]
I think we are on the same page here :loveyou: :laughing:
We hear this from LE all the time how they are staying silent about things to protect the investigation.
I am wondering how does it really help LE to stay silent about things and not be able to at least state the facts of what actually occurred?
I can only think of the one obvious reason which has been used on TV crime shows many times. Haul a person in for questioning and catch them saying something that only the criminal would know. They then have the "gotcha" moment and know they must be involved.
But other than that, what other things does it really protect or what other things helps LE by staying silent about the facts?
Excellent points, all. I interpreted "hear her voice" to preclude them having seen her, but not necessarily a fact.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If they had questions for her, those had to be in English and if they were commanding her, same thing. And if all they wanted to do was beat and torture, I guess they didn't have to select a language...........JMO
Sorry. I went and edited my post for clarity.I wasn't really responding to you...just adding my thought. I got the impression that the sheriff was NOT denying she wrote it. I assumed that by now they would know from Sherri herself. And I agree, about relevance and motive. I'm not trying to discuss what was written....there's no reason to do so. Sorry if it came across that way. I probably should have kept my mouth shut. [emoji850]
I have wondered about this this. Two females? Likely pawns sent to do the dangerous / dirty work. I.E. Make the P/U IF ransom was pd., make the release, etc.
Is there someone that works with law enforcement here? I'm trying to understand how the fact that KP released those details of her injuries might compromise the case. I mean, we've all seen TV shows where a suspect is tripped up when they reveal a fact that hasn't been released to the public...but is that really the extent of it?
Protection of the case and potential future jury pool. Protection of information/knowledge. Don't want to try cases in the public. No need to lay one's cards on the table. LE and the DA 'own' the case for the state. The public doesn't need to do anything but use good common sense when out and about, and report to police if there's something they saw/heard/know relating to this case.We hear this from LE all the time how they are staying silent about things to protect the investigation.
I am wondering how does it really help LE to stay silent about things and not be able to at least state the facts of what actually occurred?
I can only think of the one obvious reason which has been used on TV crime shows many times. Haul a person in for questioning and catch them saying something that only the criminal would know. They then have the "gotcha" moment and know they must be involved.
But other than that, what other things does it really protect or what other things helps LE by staying silent about the facts?
I agree 100 % with both of you...I 100% agree with you again. I do actually think the Sheriff made more attempts this time to sympathize with Sherri and the situation. But imagine LE's frustration if they think they are having to waste their time giving press conferences with information they think is bogus. I mean come on, nothing is adding up. I am not saying that Sherri hasn't been victimized, injured or beaten, I just don't think it's by 2 Hispanic woman, with a dark SUV and I don't think LE is buying it either.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk