RANCH
United we stand, divided we fall.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 17,998
- Reaction score
- 36,946
It's hard tell for sure if a male was ever present from this DNA evidence. The DNA will be more important if it's matched or connected to suspects down the road. JMO
Who knows where the clothes that the male DNA was recovered came from. This male may not have anything to do with this case. That could explain why the DNA hasn't shown up in any databases.Well they said neither DNA sample matched anyone in criminal databases. The FBI is involved so that seems to be a nationwide search.
Surprising as one would think that those sophisticated enough to grab a grown woman off the road as she was jogging, take her to a secret location where she is tortured for three weeks, without an explanation, and do all of this while keeping their faces partially covered, not saying each other's names or nicknames (from what we know so far), and to be able to commit such atrocities while wearing huge, dangly hoop earrings that didn't get ripped out when Sherri struggled and bashed one's head against a toilet, would have their DNA in a database somewhere for arrests/convictions for previous felonies. http://www.promegaconnections.com/dna-collection-practices-for-arrests-by-state/
.
The female DNA that was recovered from SP's body would seem to come from one of the suspects. Maybe she's been lucky and never arrested/convicted and had her DNA taken. JMO