I am still "catching up" and just read this article which caught my attention, besides the
"We still don't know what she was wearing" statement :
Link:
http://www.insidebayarea.com/bay-ar...han-month-later-search-sierra-lamar-continues
The Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office said that's simply how it does business. The agency does not provide details as they come up because detectives aren't sure how important each detail is, where it might lead them or what might happen,
says department spokesman Sgt. Jose Cardoza.
There's no telling what Sierra's kidnappers, if there are any, or reluctant witnesses might do if they knew how close investigators were getting.
R&BBM: Does anyone know IF there is a "video link" that accompanies this article ? TIA !
This statement is NOT "quoted" by the reporter with "quotation marks" ... I know I know ... the reporting if far from being "stellar" in this case ...
What I would like to know is
WHO used the words "reluctant witnesses" ? Was it LE -- OR -- was it the Reporter ?
JMO ... but this statement is important ... and
it is important to know WHO used those "particular" words :
was it LE -- OR --
was it the Reporter's words ?
Again, JMO ... but it is important to find out WHO is RESPONSIBLE for this statement because we have NOT -- NOT been told about any "reluctant witnesses" ...
Now ... it is possible that this is a "general" type of statement that LE tells reporters ... but I don't know ...
The choice of words stood out to me ...
JMO and MOO ...