D
Deleted member 117120
Guest
How sad, so awful.MKH died on October 30, 1980. His sister JL died one day earlier.
http://billiongraves.com/pages/record/MatthewKemperHartley/1929021
How sad, so awful.MKH died on October 30, 1980. His sister JL died one day earlier.
http://billiongraves.com/pages/record/MatthewKemperHartley/1929021
http://injusticebusters.org/index.htm/newstories3.htm
[SIZE=-2]May 31, 1999
[/SIZE]"He faces charges of impersonation, trafficking in a controlled substance, theft over $5,000, possession of break-in instruments, possession of property obtained by crime over $5,000 and obstructing a police officer."
So if he was charged with impersonation in 1999...is identity theft now...a different type of charge?
Ahhhh..........so then if it's being reported that they're still looking for the green truck obviously the one they picked up from G property was not the same one..........so does that mean he's truly not even involved?
I don't know how that would work logistically within these two families connected apparently.Maybe DG planned on stealing one of the L's identities.
It seems that would be both the south 40 acre parcels....the 2 with tree lined drives and both with buildings on them ....I had assumed the commentator was 'off' in his estimate ...I'd assumed 40-45 acres in the south parcel based on number of acres in a 1/4 section being 160....most parcels are even amounts....40 being VERY common...thus the 1/4 section is then split into 4's of 40 each...either west to east or into 4 equal squares. If they do own both the north & south plots that would make 80 acres. Here's another crude grid I did:
Red - 1/4 section boundaries
Blue - 4 - 40 acre parcels split in 'strips' rather than 1/4'ing *squared*..the 1/4 section....
View attachment 54249
I had assumed in my initial map *which if the Herald is correct in their labelling I will have to amend* that the property was only the front 20 acres *bounded on the east by the 291* ...not the west field and not the property north of my original label....It seems if the Herald is correct....and both parcels are G's...you were right too kittymeow!
Person of interest in missing family search, Douglas Garland. File photos courtesy @calgaryherald
https://twitter.com/BigStuff7/status/485920117336051712/photo/1
I am so..confused. I thought he did his time for the impersonation and the drug lab. He got off on the Tax problem.
If the family had in essence disowned DG for past mistakes and not supporting him financially, this could explain the old truck scenario whereby he was not driving a newer vehicle. Hypothetically, the haves and the have nots scenario maybe DG was upset with AL having money and future plans and he maybe not having neither.
I think the truck in this 1999 photo can be seen in new photos parked by some building on the property now. To me it didn't look like it has been used recently Look back at the pics it's there somewhereView attachment 54247
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/c...g+property+being+searched/10005813/story.html
Article contains a photo of the G's property c.1999.
Here in photo 3 (File photo 05/28/99) there is a truck, wonder if it's THE truck?
I would think that LE would have to have more on CCTV than the truck in the area for probable cause. They would have had to see the truck in the driveway during the hours that the crime occurred I would think. If they can see the likeness house they may have seen the family be removed from the home.
I keep getting the feeling that it is all intertwined What a mess and still NO sign of the L's and poor little Nathan Someone knows where they are or what happened surely! Keep praying for their safe returnI cant help but go back to thinking that if DG is behind this then any evidence of the people is long gone. His chemical background with drugs and in facilities creating herbicides and pesticides means he has more than a typical working knowledge of chemicals and their uses. The fact that he had 5 days head start and a large farm to spread evidence over is disturbing. Let's hope he was just somehow an accomplice or driver and not the 'mastermind ' behind this. This case is strange because it seems like two cases at times.
It still feels like someone came across the family that day and hastily threw a plan together. But then it has elements from the past that keep popping up and lead us to think it may have been a planned event that somehow the boy just happened to be there for. It's hard to get a read on which path seems most likely at times...