meterclicks
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
- Messages
- 2,040
- Reaction score
- 45
I noticed that too! Does,anyone know if their pictures are close-ups taken from other pictures?
I think they are passport photos.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I noticed that too! Does,anyone know if their pictures are close-ups taken from other pictures?
I was trying to find out the origin of the surname "Liknes" and came upon a site that showed when "Likneses" entered (or left) Canada between certain years. There are quite a few who settled in Edmonton. Personally, I would use a buyers agent if moving to another city; but, they may be acquainted with the city enough to be able to make a purchase on their own.
We simply skipped using a buyers' agent and just used our lawyer to complete the purchase of our home. The seller's agent will do the paperwork and forward to the buyers lawyer, but they will not counsel you regarding the pro's/con's of your purchase.
All that to say, AL has eight other siblings and maybe some of his family lives in Edmonton and they know the area so went ahead without an agent.
Purely speculation on my part.
While we wait for things to progress, let's look at some of the theories that have been bounced around here:
1. DG came by the L's home after the estate sale to settle a financial score, takes all 3 against their will, who knows what happened after that.....
2. After a domestic dispute gone too far, AL calls on DG to come help him out of a 'jam', maybe owes him a favor? (AL takes NO as he's a witness to the crime?)
3. Both L's skip town in hopes of disappearing due to financial woes, DG is framed. (again, why take NO?)
4. Both L's fled after unfortunate accident which physically harms/maybe worse NO. (I'm not buying that)
5. Someone mentioned a 'Casey Anthony' scenario....
Feel free to add to the list. :coffeews:
New article @ NP re: AL's business dealings
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...in-bid-to-find-him-his-wife-and-his-grandson/
6. A kidnapping, and a ransom demand that has not been made public.
You are right. I was going to listen to that again before I posted that, and should have. Big difference.
Long time lurker, first time poster.
Still catching up on how this thread has progressed today--kudos all on some excellent sleuthing! But had to jump in and post re: DG Intelligence/ADHD/drug lab
I've been wondering if someone stopped by the sale, looked around and for whatever reason decided to come back later,maybe to pick up what they bought and wanted a few extras thrown in at no cost or came back to try to haggle further and somehow a fight broke out and...
The thing that I can't get past is that if the goal was to kill the family, either premeditated or spur of the moment, why kidnap them/move their bodies if they we're killed at the house? It makes no sense. Taking the family/moving bodies would create further risk of being seen moving them to a vehicle, having them seen in a vehicle, having fibres/DNA left in a vehicle,etc.
But if that's not the case then the only motive left would be kidnapping. What could be the possible motive to kidnap the grandparents? I known there have been cases of home invasions where the perpetrators drive th victims around to different ATMs and force them to make withdrawals, but even in those cases, the usually leave one victims at home as insurance and police have a record of ATM withdrawals/ATM surveillance cameras. So what gives?
My next best guess is something with a neighbour like what happened with Alicia Ross?
New article @ NP re: AL's business dealings
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...in-bid-to-find-him-his-wife-and-his-grandson/
I've been wondering if someone stopped by the sale, looked around and for whatever reason decided to come back later,maybe to pick up what they bought and wanted a few extras thrown in at no cost or came back to try to haggle further and somehow a fight broke out and...
The thing that I can't get past is that if the goal was to kill the family, either premeditated or spur of the moment, why kidnap them/move their bodies if they we're killed at the house? It makes no sense. Taking the family/moving bodies would create further risk of being seen moving them to a vehicle, having them seen in a vehicle, having fibres/DNA left in a vehicle,etc.
But if that's not the case then the only motive left would be kidnapping. What could be the possible motive to kidnap the grandparents? I known there have been cases of home invasions where the perpetrators drive th victims around to different ATMs and force them to make withdrawals, but even in those cases, the usually leave one victims at home as insurance and police have a record of ATM withdrawals/ATM surveillance cameras. So what gives?
My next best guess is something with a neighbour like what happened with Alicia Ross?
I wonder if the bank card belongs to AL.
No body, No Crime. You know the saying.
It's very hard to get a conviction in canada without a body."
They wanted to ensure their freedom anyway possible after the crime after all it is their life on the line now.
If you google "conviction without a body" you will see there are plenty of cases. As you suggested the amount of blood or brain matter or body parts you cannot live without would all be evidence of death.
I wonder if the bank card belongs to AL.