What is *really* gross to me, is the thought that it could even be possible for B to kill H by 'ligature neck compression', considering that she had seemingly, not too long ago, recovered from throat cancer. I don't hear anyone arguing that the man loved his wife of .. how many years was it? She went through what had to have been a horrible illness, and apparently(?) beat cancer, in the same area of her body where she was killed.. I can imagine it must have been a stressful and perhaps scary time for both of them, even if the outcome was promising. And I can completely understand that *anyone* can 'lose it', and snap, and do something regrettable, given the right circumstances for any given individual, but even so - could he have done *that*, to *her*, by that method, in that area of her body? I suppose some would say that when you lose it, you lose it.. but I find it unthinkable that he could have carried out that act by that particular method on her. jmo.