That was from the lawyer not LE again mooWhile his wrists were tied!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was from the lawyer not LE again mooWhile his wrists were tied!
From The Toronto Star Jan 26
Toronto homicide detectives have confirmed Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed six weeks ago, strangled, then held upright by leather belts looped around the smooth stainless steel railing of their homes indoor pool.
*********And, I am sorry if this offends anyone, it is not meant to. *******
But, when anyone retires they are often under the feet of the person who is at home. The person at home, is used to going about their day and the retiree, is often following them around like a puppy, with a 'what are we going to do now?" look on their face. THAT can be exasperating.
*******As I said, not trying to offend anyone. BUT its true.******
This, and I also don't think the HS was a housewife waiting around for him. She worked just as frequently in philanthropy, sitting on multiple boards, supporting organizations, participating in fundraising. I think this couple was just fine in their dynamics, imo.Although BS retired, he continued to work at Apotex.
"Sherman had stepped down as CEO in 2012, but continued to work long hours at the company he founded...".
http://business.financialpost.com/n...-apotex-resigns-to-pursue-other-opportunities
Which means the same thing, imo. Manner of death upgraded from suspicious, to homicide.I don't think they declared it to be a double homicide. I believe Det-Sgt Gomes said that they had "sufficient evidence to describe it as a double homicide investigation".
Which means the same thing, imo. Manner of death upgraded from suspicious, to homicide.
I guess the point I was trying to make is that police said that they think it's a double homicide. That's what I think too. But police haven't declared it definitely was, and I don't think it's ludicrous or wrong for some posters to articulate that murder-suicide is still plausible.
But they declared that BS and HS were targetted and it is a double homicide. Not sure what more LE has to say to close the murder suicide concerns. The evidence that we know also points to Double homicide. All the murder suicide theories so far negates some of the known evidence (jackets bound, death by neck compression, BS and HS coming home at different times, no reports of maritial discord). It is ok to put out theories but it is important to remember all the known facts so far.
Det-Sgt Gomes has a great track record.
http://www.metronews.ca/news/canada...g-sherman-probe-has-proven-track-record-.html
Isnt she paid to devote hours to examining and reviewing evidence in order to solve crimes? Is this unusual in TPS homicide investigations?
Wondering if " bulky " includes items such as clothing from closets if the belts used were there, bedding if B or HS had been asleep in bed, and towels in case the perp/s used them?Maybe it is a Canadian way to express it. But it seems weird. Bulk items? Packaged items? LE puts items into bulk and packages them as well?
Isnt she paid to devote hours to examining and reviewing evidence in order to solve crimes? Is this unusual in TPS homicide investigations?
Probably more easily than I could, but the difference in statistics is significant. 69% of homicides in the US are by gun (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm) while in Canada it is 36%(http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/legal01-eng.htm). So evidently it is possible, but to say that it can't be a planned murder because they would have used a gun is not really an inference that can be drawn in Canada.
It's not really an inference that can be drawn anywhere, imo. A planned murder does not equate to gun use.Probably more easily than I could, but the difference in statistics is significant. 69% of homicides in the US are by gun (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm) while in Canada it is 36%(http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/legal01-eng.htm). So evidently it is possible, but to say that it can't be a planned murder because they would have used a gun is not really an inference that can be drawn in Canada.
It's not really an inference that can be drawn anywhere, imo. A planned murder does not equate to gun use.