Very lengthy article with lots of detail.
The ''new information'' that led ''police to pursue the theory that someone — or some people — were watching Honey and Barry before the murders'', did not grab my attention previously, but it does now.
On another note, why would BS be tied so tightly at the wrists, does that suggest HS was not tied as tightly? Apparently he usually parked in the garage.
Also, wondering how the S offspring feel about BS's nephew TF, telling LE that the S's were frustrated that their kids lack a ''work ethic''
Dec. 31, 2021 rbbm.
Documents show police sought cellphone data for dozens of ‘persons of interest,’ and confirm Barry Sherman had been ‘restrained at the wrist.’
www.thestar.com
''One year into the Barry and Honey Sherman murder investigation, a bombshell: Toronto
Police believed it was possible the murderer or murderers were stalking the billionaire couple a month or more before they were killed, search warrant documents reveal.
But police were struggling.
A Toronto judge was repeatedly denying their request to track by cellular telephone transmission the whereabouts, at the time of the murders, of 35 individuals who were “persons of interest.”
''Pathologists made the determination that Barry was restrained by both looking at red marks circling Barry’s wrists, and by autopsy, locating the pooling of blood beneath the skin, a sign that
he was likely bound tightly.''
....
''While this was going on,
one person police had previously interviewed came forward with new information. This is described starkly in one ITO as “new information,” but the pages the Star has obtained from court are completely redacted because
police say to reveal that information will harm their case.
This “new information” appears to have led police to pursue the theory that someone — or some people — were watching Honey and Barry before the murders.
By mid-2018, detectives already had the tracking data emitted by Barry’s BlackBerry and Honey’s iPhone. Now, by December 2018, they were still seeking permission to obtain the tracking data from as many as 35 other cellphones.
Due, it appears, to the new information, police wanted to “parallel the tracking data from Bernard’s or Honey’s cellular phone records,” police state. “If they do parallel this could indicate that Bernard and/or Honey were followed or were under surveillance,” police wrote in their application to the court.
''While Bell and Rogers keep all data for at least a year, Telus deletes texting data after 150 days (but keeps other data for longer). Rogers, the documents show, keeps its data for 13 months and in Yim’s December application, 12 months after the murders, Yim said he feared the data “could be lost forever.” Bell keeps all of its data for three years.
Three times from June to November, Pringle was asked to approve applications for phone tracking data for these phones (cellphones “ping” off a tower and give highly accurate latitude and longitude co-ordinates of where they are located)
going back in most cases one month before the murders, but in some cases several months. Each time she allowed a few, but denied most.''
''These interview statements — there are dozens in each of the ITOs — consist of people telling police their theories of who might have a grudge against the Shermans, peppered with recollections of who the Shermans were and their daily habits. How Barry was brilliant, but invested millions of dollars with people and was sometimes taken advantage of;
how he worked late and liked to park in the basement garage (where he did the night he died). How Honey was a good friend to many, but did not always get along with her children, and always parked in the driveway on the right side of the house (which she did the night she died). And how, as Barry’s nephew Ted Florence told police,
Barry and Honey had “some frustrations with their children because of their lack of work ethic because the children were raised in and exposed to a lot of money.”
''Yim went back to court in December with a different tactic, still seeking permission for the tracking data for about two dozen phones. Pringle had been holding him to a high standard,
insisting that police provide “reasonable grounds” to believe that the tracking data would provide “evidence” of murder. Now Yim argued that all he needed to provide was “reasonable grounds to suspect data will assist in the investigation.”
''Looking at all of these applications it is clear that the police were looking for the following: proof that one or more of those 35 people were following the Shermans around for a month or more; were near Old Colony Road the night of the murders; or were communicating with the unknown suspect with the odd walk that police long believed was either the killer or a lookout for the killer.
With a few of the numbers, police also wanted access to “tracking and transmission data” six to eight weeks after the murder, just before and just after police announced the Shermans were “targeted” in a double murder. And while there is no indication in these documents that there were any wire taps of phones, one heavily redacted section is headed, “events that may stimulate conversation between involved parties.”