The area of the park he was thought to be in is very remote... not accessed by hwy 60 at all. You take hwy 11 to south river then out chemical road to kawayamog (round) lake. There is no reason to go hwy 60 for this area of the park. There are very few people on north tea lake year round. This is back country camping... accessed by canoe or kayak, or hike in from trails ... and you would still need a canoe/kayak to get down the lake. You cannot drive a car right to this lake. Uncertain if this is where he actually was headed, but it was referenced as a destination on his Facebook page. Also campsites are not Reservable in these areas. You tell the park rangers where your headed/ destination area, campsites are marked but really first come first serve. There are also many portages in this area to other lakes... also with campsites. It is possible to portage all the way to kiosk which is at north end of park from this area...quite easily. That being said his car should be obvious and have been found by now. There are lots of atvs, hunters in area, that travel the atv trails and most definitely most of the roads around there. It would be unusual to see any vehicle just parked in this area for no reason for a length of time and would raise suspicion... there is a parking lot at round lake where the pass was thought to have been purchased. .. it is small though... car must not have been there they would have found it. If you parked there and we're intending to head into north tea, you would get in water there and portage. Or drive car to another access point to tea lake (there are only 2 that I know of) then hike your canoe to waters edge. Could be more accesses? But I don't think so. Park rangers would be familiar with these though and it sounds like they have been assisting.
Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk
I'm stumped over the purchase of the overnight camping permit but then he didn't end up staying. Did he intend to camp overnight but ran into trouble before he could start portaging? Did they own a canoe/kayak? If not, why did he pay for the permit but not rent a canoe/kayak to get out to his destination? This is a huge piece of the puzzle, imo.
It's strange because the media articles tend to contradict themselves. Some say he bought a day pass and others allude to a camping pass. Does anyone know if you have to indicate people's name on day or camping passes or do you just have to indicate the number of people in the car as there is a fee per person? This Global News article indicates from Det. Brown that Eugene bought a day permit to Algonquin park. https://globalnews.ca/news/3785231/missing-38-year-old-markham-man/
I'm stumped over the purchase of the overnight camping permit but then he didn't end up staying. Did he intend to camp overnight but ran into trouble before he could start portaging? Did they own a canoe/kayak? If not, why did he pay for the permit but not rent a canoe/kayak to get out to his destination? This is a huge piece of the puzzle, imo.
Okay your forum your rules. I don't quite understand what I am allowed to post then if not hypothesis on a direction for investigation. A potential lead has come up today and we are going to ignore discussing it when it could bring the story into focus?
Post landing at random here ...
Websleuths does not allow information to be brought over from random blogs as we cannot verify the source of the information. We continue to rely on MSM or LE, and our own members' sleuthing capabilities for information.
:wave:
Sometimes if i want to post something that has come up or make a suggestion ect. i will add to my post that it is a rumour or that it is just speculation in my own opinion.
Hoping that everyone keeps brain storming and that major news sources( msn) continue to post articles about this very baffling case, which is of interest and concern to many!
imo.
Now you have me wondering what details you were going to share. We are starving for information in this case!