Lalalacasbah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,103
- Reaction score
- 6,635
For me, the big question is, why have they stopped killing? was three enough? did that assuage the rage, or was that the agreed number pre-spree, or ( and forgive me for this ) was a woman not counted, and the plan was for two? . why stop? .
Why only kill three when one can, logistically, kill a lot more, if killing is the name of the game. ..
Having murdered three people, what would be the point of stopping? why not go on, let it all hang out, go for broke. ..
The answer for me is, they are dead. Dead and cold somewhere, being eaten by a cranky bear. Of course, they could have run out of ammo, but why confine oneself to shooting targets? What would make them stop the journey they were on, and take another tack? . What was the magic inherent in the number three?
Having murdered three, what now, then?
Some good questions. Maybe one has a conscience and freaked after the 3 and said no way, no more. Or they are dead.