casesensitive
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2012
- Messages
- 1,283
- Reaction score
- 8,509
This article attributes the approval of the Trial by Judge in order to expedite the process due to Canada’s Jordan ruling. In the same report it’s noted the Prosecution objected (but obviously were overruled). But it was still the defence who argued for it as the court cannot mandate it otherwise.
“Lawyers consider a judge-alone trial highly unusual for murder, outside of cases in which the defence is one of mental disorder. It usually requires special circumstances.
“Jury trials are virtually mandatory for murder charges,” based on the principle that the most serious charge in the Criminal Code should be tried by members of the community, said Christopher Hicks, a Toronto lawyer involved in the 2012 jury-vetting case at the Supreme Court, in an interview. "So this is a very bold move by the judge. He’s obviously concerned about the lapse of time.” Mr. Lacy said it could have taken until March or April to empanel another jury; by then, the case might have run afoul of Supreme Court time limits...”
Mistrial declared in Dennis Oland murder trial, but case will continue before judge alone
For whatever reason, like I said, the defense did not have the option of deciding on a judge only trial.