There is a photog who has been linked with DM. I am going strictly from memory of forum posts here, but this photog has taken photos in the MillardAir hanger. It was also stated that he took photos on the farm before DM owned it. So there is a possible link to the property. Search threads for "the hun". I don't think the folks following that trail found much else of interest. And the photog is strictly non POI as far as I know.
LE did suggest they would be finishing up on the farm on Saturday or weather may be the issue, we had a lot of rain last night and I can't imagine those fields would be easy to work in if soaked; there is also a chance of thundershowers today.Light presence and not alot of activity.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitch...rloo-millard-police-still-searching-farm.html
If it's been reported by LE that his phone was turned off within ONE MILE from his home
I believe its been confirmed that he first got the word tattooed and at a later date put the frame around it.
There were photos of his arm floating around, several without a frame and one with a frame.
Don't have the links right now though...
JMO I have ponder the theory he may have been adopted. I considered the age of his father, which to me is getting up their in age for deciding to have a child, it happens yes I realize. Something else I thought about is MB being a stewardess. Sometimes these women consider not having children because of their careers and the time spent away from home. As WM and MB got older, they felt like they wanted a child and if she was close in age to WM, it would have become a bit of a risk having children at her age. Therefore they could have decided to adopt. MB decided once they adopted a child she would retire for being a stewardess or go part time or take a position with Millardair. Did they decide to have a child to carry on the family business? Have we been privy to MB's age or DOB? This could also explain why DM was in a private French school. One he may have lived on res while his parents worked through the week. So with DM having his DNA in a databank, possibly he was searching for parents, siblings, relatives? :dunno:
Newbie here - have only lurked up until now.
Re: children's toys in neighbouring yard: when we drove through Roseville Road last week, we so noticed this property. From my own recollection as someone somewhat local, this property has appeared to either only be half used (home but empty, old barn) or possibly divided in two for sale with only the residential/house half occupied. There is nothing unusual about this in this part of the region, which is very farm-centric outside of the bigger cities (Kitchener, Waterloo, Guelph and to a lesser extent, Cambridge).
Hey everyone. Returning after a few days break (the thread was a bit out of control then). I can't possibly catch up with this thread at work. I know about the LB connection and DM's father and the additional remains (not confirmed human yet) on the farm. Any other major developments I should know about before I dive back in? :fencefall:
The last paragraph above, Carli - why do say this? If anything, to me, I think LE has released very little information in the grand scheme of things.
-they haven't commented on whether other suspects have been found/arrested (or found deceased)
-they haven't indicated where exactly TB's body was found
-they haven't indicated exactly how they were able to confirm it was TB's 'burned beyond recognition' body that they found
-they haven't indicated whether there was evidence of human remains inside the incinerator
-they haven't released any of their findings at the various crime scenes, only recently did they release that they've found more remains but can't confirm if human (frankly not sure why this was released until it was confirmed they are human)
-they haven't indicated why they've stated it appears that TB 'put up a fight/struggle'
There is tons of info they've not released, a lot of it the very things we're discussing and questioning here on WS.
I can't think of any brutal, senseless murder of this nature that's happened in Canada that hasn't received a lot of coverage, for obvious reasons.
If anything, a lot of the info in this case is being perpetuated by the Media and hate to say it but even we here are adding to it, which then just feeds the media.
What do you think LE has released that they shouldn't have? I think they have to provide some info, as they have -- people are scared, people are shocked, people are grieving and trying to make sense of why a good young man/husband/Daddy was brutally murdered. I'm sure there are a lot of people out there in ON who are scared and fearing for their and their family's safety, particularly if they believe there are other suspects on the loose out there.
Because trailer was at his moms, does not mean he put it there.
Because remains are at farm, does not mean he put them there.
Because someone says he drove their pickup (first test drive) does not mean that this first test was factual at this point.
Because someone says there was a tattoo of 'ambition' with a box around it does not mean that it was DM. (especially if his tattoo has no box around)
etc
If that were the case, then you would dump the truck at your first chance, take it out to no where, torch it so there is zero evidence left and then jump into the 2nd vehicle and get outa there... no for me, the truck fits into a larger puzzle, had to be a Diesel Ram and twin cab and black... those are the common elements.
None of those things on their own mean DM is guilty of this crime but all of them together are going to make these things awfully hard to explain away.
Welcome back. That's about it so far I believe.
Well anyone could have put them there to be honest. It seems too obvious to me that everything was strategically placed at places that belong to the Millard family. Most murderers appear to drive bodies to places far from their homes, unless they kill within their homes and do not want to be seen leaving or traveling with a deceased from what I have read. Not saying there are not exceptions to the rule, but it seems very 'organized' to me.
Dirk Derstine, who heads the firm along with Jennifer Penman, said that Millard requested a meeting with the firm, something Paradkar said client has denied.
"All of our communication with Mr. Millard was proper, above board and above reproach," Derstine said. "We tried to contact Mr. Paradkar about this matter but as he does not have an office this was made more difficult."
Derstine has represented clients in a number of high-profile cases over the years. He defended Michael Rafferty, who last year was convicted for the kidnapping, sexual assault, and first-degree murder of 8-year-old Tori Stafford of Woodstock.
Derstine's law firm trying to get this case:
http://www.mississauga.com/news/article/1619944--d-t-citizen