Disagreeing is fun. You did blame Baez for certain things that you would have no way of knowing. It's in there.
In where?
I disagree with the part about your post about Baez lying. Baez is under no obligation to keep us informed about the status of his defense. Any rule requiring him to provide honest answers to members of the media would be absurd and unconstitutional, as such a rule would, among other things, require Baez to violate the attorney-client privilege.
Where I come from, the Bar Rules prohibit lawyers from speaking to the media about their cases while they are current. In my opinion, he has gone way too far with what he said, and when he says things like "i never spoke to them about any immunity" and we later find out he did, like it or not, it reflects poorly on his client, and it should not be happening. He has nothing to gain for his client by making these sorts of statements. It's not about saving face, it's about looking after your client's best interests.
I don't understand why so many others feel that they have some sort of entitlement to Baez's secret game plan.
I think quite the opposite...I think the guy is a blabber mouth and is going to get himself in trouble if he keeps making public statements, and continue to make his client look worse
We are not harmed by Baez's statements.
Correct. His client is harmed by them.
To the extent that he might be lying, circumstances require him to lie.
Totally disagree. He is not LE, he is an attorney, and I don't know what the Florida bar is like, but I know most bar associations don't allow attorneys to lie to the public. They are just supposed to keep quiet.
It's no different than LE lying to the media about the status of the criminal investigation -- it's the other side of the same coin.