deejaye
No dinner is complete without a little dog hair...
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 106
- Reaction score
- 0
So who was watching Caylee?
Zenaida from Imaginannies R Us...
Just smack me now.:banghead:
So who was watching Caylee?
So who was watching Caylee?
Casey fabricated the Nanny a long time ago to appease her mother. That's an easy one.
So who was watching Caylee?
So who was watching Caylee?
(I do not know where to put this.)
I worked on the dates when Casey first got pregnant long ago. Kept it close to watch other developments.
My own questioning had to do with the relationship between Casey and her mother. It dawned on me that Casey did not want to keep the baby. Cindy talked her into keeping it. I imagine Cindy outlined how Casey's life could be if she would only keep that baby and live with them. Girls at 17, really are dependent upon those around them to help out in a crisis.
Casey entered high school senior year at 17.
The cartoon network where? In whose house? Please forgive me people. I'm trying to wrap my arms around this, but have so many questions.Depending on who you ask, it was the grandparents, or Holly the neighbor, or Invisananny, or as I suspect, quite often, the Cartoon Network.
Small correction. Independent verification of her existence is actually June 15th when she was at the assisted living facility.Cindy Anthony took care of Caylee and was the defacto parent for the majority of her life that is until June 16h
And she hasn't been seen since.
The cartoon network where? In whose house? Please forgive me people. I'm trying to wrap my arms around this, but have so many questions.
why didn't anyone come to that child's rescue before it came to this? IIRC, Cindy (or George) said they came home every night until the blow up on June 15-16. Whatever you believe about those dates.
Not to mention the questioning about the need for a nanny during a period of time when Casey is unable to prove that she was gainfully employed.I disagree. It's not as easy as you suggest. Fabricating a nanny to resolve some private family matter that might have existed during this past year is no explanation for why Casey would use this same fake nanny to explain Caylee's disappearance to LE. They're mutually exclusive matters. And besides, it's an idiotic explanation because at trial, the defense will now have to explain why, among many other things, there is no photographic evidence of this nanny and why there are no telephone records evincing communications between the Anthony and this supposed nanny that was supposedly in Caylee's life for more than a year. Not to mention that no family member other than Casey ever saw this woman first-hand.
Exactly! If nothing else, make a deal with someone else to "find" her in a park and return her - and share the reward money with them to keep yourself out of the spotlight.
I disagree. It's not as easy as you suggest. Fabricating a nanny to resolve some private family matter that might have existed during this past year is no explanation for why Casey would use this same fake nanny to explain Caylee's disappearance to LE. They're mutually exclusive matters. And besides, it's an idiotic explanation because at trial, the defense will now have to explain why, among many other things, there is no photographic evidence of this nanny and why there are no telephone records evincing communications between the Anthony and this supposed nanny.
That Casey invented a nanny to deal with her mother didn't force her to use this phantom nanny in order to explain Caylee's disappearance.
Small correction. Independent verification of her existence is actually June 15th when she was at the assisted living facility.
Not if you believe George. He said he saw Caylee and Casey leave at 1:10 p.m. (afternoon) on the 16th, and remembers this specifically because he was watching his "show" on the food network channel. This was Monday and Casey and Caylee both walked out wearing back packs.Small correction. Independent verification of her existence is actually June 15th when she was at the assisted living facility.
Not if you believe George. He said he saw Caylee and Casey leave at 1:10 p.m. (afternoon) on the 16th, and remembers this specifically because he was watching his "show" on the food network channel. This was Monday and Casey and Caylee both walked out wearing back packs.
Thank God - my heart sank
I disagree. It's not as easy as you suggest. Fabricating a nanny to resolve some private family matter that might have existed long before Caylee went missing is no explanation for why Casey would use this same fake nanny to explain Caylee's disappearance to LE. They're mutually exclusive matters. And besides, it's an idiotic explanation because at trial, the defense will now have to explain why, among many other things, there is no photographic evidence of this nanny that was involved with Caylee for more than a year (according to Casey) and why there are no telephone records evincing communications between the Anthony and this supposed nanny. Not to mention that no family member other than Casey ever saw this woman first-hand.
That Casey invented a nanny to deal with her mother didn't force her to use this phantom nanny in order to explain Caylee's disappearance.
Not if you believe George. He said he saw Caylee and Casey leave at 1:10 p.m. (afternoon) on the 16th, and remembers this specifically because he was watching his "show" on the food network channel. This was Monday and Casey and Caylee both walked out wearing back packs.
The cartoon network where? In whose house? Please forgive me people. I'm trying to wrap my arms around this, but have so many questions.
why didn't anyone come to that child's rescue before it came to this? IIRC, Cindy (or George) said they came home every night until the blow up on June 15-16. Whatever you believe about those dates.